Love for Mother Earth: Dialogues for a Possible Intercultural Ecological Philosophyical Philosophy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/kawsaypacha.202602.A007

Keywords:

Ecophilosoph, Indigenous Ancestral Knowledge, Sacredness, Ecological Interconnection, Relational Ethics

Abstract

This article proposes an exploratory dialogue between contemporary ecophilosophy and diverse formulations of Indigenous thought, examining possible resonances in the understanding of the Earth as a living and sacred being while avoiding forced convergences where fundamental ontological differences persist. Drawing on the thought of Henryk Skolimowski and Roger Scruton, it argues that overcoming the ecological crisis requires questioning the mechanistic ontology of modernity and cultivating an affective, ethical, and poetic relationship with the cosmos. The analysis is developed within the framework of comparative philosophy, bringing heterogeneous traditions into dialogue without presupposing full conceptual equivalence. The Indigenous reflections considered in the article emphasize reciprocity, care, and interdependence among living beings. While Skolimowski advances a planetary ethic grounded in reverence for life, Scruton highlights affective attachment to place as a foundation for ecological responsibility. These perspectives make it possible to identify partial zones of resonance with certain Amerindian elaborations concerning health, spirituality, community, and responsibility toward the Earth. The article argues for the possibility of a respectful intercultural dialogue among diverse systems of thought and advocates a plural, relational ecological ethic attentive to the diversity of ways of inhabiting the cosmos.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bookchin, M. (1982). The ecology of freedom: The emergence and dissolution of hierarchy. Cheshire Books.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.

Cajete, G. (2000). Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Clear Light Publishers.

Callicott, J. B. (1989). In defense of the land ethic: Essays in environmental philosophy. State University of New York Press.

Devall, B. & Sessions, G. (2007). Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. Gibbs Smith Publisher.

Estermann, J. (2009). Filosofía andina: Sabiduría indígena para un nuevo mundo. Instituto Superior Ecuménico Andino de Teología.

Favaron, P. (2017). Las visiones y los mundos: Sendas visionarias de la Amazonía occidental. CAAAP & Universidad Nacional de Ucayali.

Favaron, P. (2020). La senda del corazón: Sabiduría de los pueblos indígenas de Norteamérica. Heredad.

Favaron, P. & Bensho, C. (2023). Non onan shinan: Los mundos medicinales y la sabiduría ancestral de una familia shipibo-konibo. CAAAP, Pakarina & Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Gorz, A. (1980). Ecology as politics. South End Press.

Humboldt, A. von (1944). Cosmos: Ensayo de una descripción física del mundo (Original publicado 1845). Glem.

Krenak, A. (2020). Ideas to postpone the end of the world. Anansi International.

Longboat, D. & Sheridan, J. (2006). The Haudenosaunee imagination and the ecology of the sacred. Space and Culture, 9(4), pp. 365-381.

Naess, A. (2005). The basics of deep ecology. The Trumpeter, 21(1), pp. 61-71. (Original publicado 1986).

Scruton, R. (2012). Green philosophy: How to think seriously about the planet. Atlantic Books.

Skolimowski, H. (2017). Filosofía viva: La ecofilosofía como un árbol de la vida (Original publicado 1992). Atalanta.

Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.

Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-12

Issue

Section

ACADEMIC ARTICLES AND ESSAY

How to Cite

Favaron Peyon, P. M. (2026). Love for Mother Earth: Dialogues for a Possible Intercultural Ecological Philosophyical Philosophy. Revista Kawsaypacha: Sociedad Y Medio Ambiente, (18), A-007. https://doi.org/10.18800/kawsaypacha.202602.A007