Coproducción de conocimiento y gestión medioambiental. Una revisión sistemática de literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/kawsaypacha.202501.A005Palabras clave:
Gestión del conocimiento, Conocimiento tradicional o indígena/local, Gestión medioambiental, Procesos de coproducción de conocimientoResumen
El presente estudio realiza un análisis de la literatura sobre coproducción de conocimiento para la gestión ambiental, enfocándose en sus definiciones, principios, condiciones y procesos, y todo aspecto que contribuya a una mejor y más eficiente coproducción de conocimiento para las organizaciones. Se basa en una revisión bibliográfica de 45 artículos publicados en revistas indexadas en Scopus y Web of Science entre 2013 y 2024, utilizando un análisis temático para identificar los factores clave que sustentan la coproducción de conocimiento, en el marco de la gestión medioambiental, ámbito donde dicho concepto toma especial relevancia. Los resultados muestran que la coproducción de conocimiento es un concepto emergente, de gran interés para organizaciones de distinta índole, toda vez que incluye diferentes tipos de conocimiento, que pueden ser catalogados como científico e indígena, local o tradicional, orientándolos a la mejora en la toma de decisiones, entre muchos otros ámbitos, de índole medioambiental.
Descargas
Referencias
Abreu, J. S., Domit, C., & Zappes, C. A. (2017). Is there dialogue between researchers and traditional community members? The importance of integration between traditional knowledge and scientific knowledge to coastal management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 141(March 2018), pp. 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.03.003
Al Mamun, A., & Natcher, D. (2023). The promise and pitfalls of community ‑ based monitoring with a focus on Canadian examples. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10841-y
Armatas, C. A., Borrie, W. T., Watson, A. E., Armatas, C. A., Borrie, W. T., & Watson, A. E. (2022). A Social Science Method for Public Engagement in the Context of Natural Resource Planning in the United States A Social Science Method for Public Engagement in the Context of Natural Resource Planning in the United States. Society & Natural Resources, 35(5), pp. 506-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1996666
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A., Kocho-schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011). Co-management and the co-production of knowledge : Learning to adapt in Canada ’ s Arctic. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), pp. 995-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006
Avila, J., & Agrawal, A. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the politics of classification Related papers Indigenous Knowledges and t he Polit ics of Classificat ion.
Brouwers, H., Verwoerd, L., Loeber, A., Regeer, B., & Klaassen, P. (2023). Accommodating coexisting impact rationales in knowledge co-production : The case of the Natuurpact reflexive evaluation. Environmental Science and Policy, 137(August 2022), pp. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.07.033
Campbell, L. K., Svendsen, E. S., & Roman, L. A. (2016). Knowledge Co-production at the Research – Practice Interface : Embedded Case Studies from Urban Forestry. Environmental Management, 57(6), pp. 1262-1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0680-8
Çidik, M. S., Schiller, G., Zhang, N., Rizzo, A., Tambovceva, T., Bajare, D., & Hendawy, M. (2023). How Does ‘ Locality ’ Matter in Enabling a Circular Built Environment ?: A Focus on Space , Knowledge , and Cities. Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45980-1
Connor, R. A. O., Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Leach, J., Lim-camacho, L., Medvecky, F., Kerkhoff, L. Van, & Raman, S. (2021). The role of environmental managers in knowledge co-production : Insights from two case studies. Environmental Science and Policy, 116(December 2020), pp. 188-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.12.001
Del Moral, A., Pazos, J., Rodríguez, E., Rodríguez-Patón, A., & Suárez, S. (2007). Gestión del conocimiento. International Thompson Editores.
Djenontin, I. N. S., & Meadow, A. (2018). The art of co-production of knowledge in environmental sciences and management : lessons from international practice. Environmental Management, pp. 885-903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1028-3
Eid, M., & Nuhu, N. (2011). Impact of learning culture and information technology use on knowledge sharing of Saudi students. Knowledge Management Research & Practice.
Frantzeskaki, N., & Kabisch, N. (2016). Environmental Science & Policy Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance — Lessons from Rotterdam , Netherlands and. Environmental Science and Policy, 62, pp. 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.010
Hallberg-sramek, I., Priebe, J., Reimerson, E., & Nordstr, E. (2023). Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services. 60(August 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2023.101512
Hauser, D. D. W., Whiting, A. V, Mahoney, A. R., Goodwin, J., & Harris, C. (2021). Co-production of knowledge reveals loss of Indigenous hunting opportunities in the face of accelerating Arctic climate change OPEN ACCESS Co-production of knowledge reveals loss of Indigenous hunting opportunities in the face of accelerating Arctic climate change.
He, S., Su, Y., & Cheng, H. (2022). Coordinating community resource use and conservation : An institutional diagnostic practice in the Wuyishan National Park. 317(April 2021).
Hodgson, I. D., Redpath, S. M., Fischer, A., & Young, J. (2019). Who knows best? Understanding the use of research-based knowledge in conservation conflicts. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, pp. 1065-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.023
Jacobson, N. (2007). Social Epistemology: Theory for the “Fourth Wave” of Knowledge Transfer and Exchange Research. Science Communication, 29(1), pp. 116-127.
Kadykalo, A. N., Cooke, S. J., & Young, N. (2021). The role of western-based scientific, Indigenous and local knowledge in wildlife management and conservation. People and Nature, 3(3), pp. 610-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10194
Kadykalo, A. N., Findlay, C. S., Spencer, M., Callaghan, C. L., Cooke, S. J., & Young, N. (2024). Collaboration and engagement with decision-makers are needed to reduce evidence complacency in wildlife management. Ambio, 53(5), pp. 730-745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-024-01979-9
Kliskey, A. A., Williams, P., Trammell, E. J., Cronan, D., Grif, D., Alessa, L., Lammers, R., Haro-martí, M. E. De, & Oxarango-ingram, J. (2023). Building trust , building futures : Knowledge co-production as relationship , design , and process in transdisciplinary science. February. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1007105
Larondelle, N., Frantzeskaki, N., & Haase, D. (2016). Mapping transition potential with stakeholder- and policy-driven scenarios in Rotterdam City. 70, pp. 630-643.
Lauer, M. (2017). Changing understandings of local knowledge in island environments. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000303
Laursen, S., Puniwai, N., Genz, A. S., Nash, S. A. B., & Canale, L. K. (2018). Collaboration Across Worldviews : Managers and Scientists on Hawai ʻ i Island Utilize Knowledge Coproduction to Facilitate Climate Change Adaptation. Environmental Management, pp. 619-630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1069-7
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., & John, P. A. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
Löfmarck, E., & Lidskog, R. (2017). Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide. Environmental Science and Policy, 69, pp. 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.12.008
Mackay, M., Taylor, C. N., Saunders, J., Rutherford, P., & Saunders, C. (2024). Integrated impact assessment for land and water management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 105(December 2023), 107397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107397
Maclean, K., & Cullen, L. (2010). Research methodologies for the co ‐ production of knowledge for environmental management in Australia. 6758. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014220909510581
Malmborg, K., Wallin, I., Brukas, V., Do, T., Lodin, I., Neset, T.-S., Norstrom, A., Powell, N., & Tonderski, K. (2022). Knowledge co-production in the Helge å catchment : a comparative analysis. Ecosystems and People, 18(1), pp. 565-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2125583
Marra, M. (2022). Meso Evaluation for SDGs ’ Complexity and Ethics Meso Evaluation for SDGs ’ Complexity and Ethics. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 25(3), pp. 316-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2021.1940450
Nilsson, A. E., Avango, D., & Rosqvist, G. (2021). Social-ecological-technological systems consequences of mining: An analytical framework for more holistic impact assessments. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(4), 101011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2021.101011
Nonaka & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka & Takeuchi, H., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), pp. 1-20.
Norström, A. V, Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., Bednarek, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., Bremond, A. De, Campbell, B. M., Canadell, J. G., Carpenter, S. R., Folke, C., Fulton, E. A., Gaffney, O., Gelcich, S., Jouffray, J., Leach, M., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
O’Connor, R., Nel, J. L., Roux, D. J., Lim-camacho, L., van Kerkhoff, L., & Leach, J. (2019). Principles for evaluating knowledge co-production in natural resource management : Incorporating decision-maker values. Journal of Environmental Management, 249(August), 109392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109392
Olazabal, M., Chiabai, A., Foudi, S., & Neumann, M. B. (2018). Emergence of new knowledge for climate change adaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, 83(October 2017), pp. 46-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.01.017
Otsuka, K. (2022). optation in co- production : Maintaining credibility and legitimacy in transboundary environmental governance in East Asia. June, pp. 771-797. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12497
Parviainen, T., Kuikka, S., & Haapasaari, P. (2022). Enhancing science-policy interface in marine environmental governance : Oil spill response models as boundary objects in the Gulf of Finland , Baltic Sea. Marine Policy, 135(November 2021), 104863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104863
Pluchinotta, I., Zhou, K., Moore, G., Salvia, G., Belesova, K., Mohajeri, N., Hale, J., Davies, M., & Zimmermann, N. (2024). Co-producing knowledge on the use of urban natural space : Participatory system dynamics modelling to understand a complex urban system. Journal of Environmental Management, 353(June 2023), 120110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120110
Quiocho, K., Kikiloi, K., Kuoha, K., Miller, A., Ka, B., Andrade, P., & Wilhelm, A. (2023). Mai Ka P ō Mai : applying Indigenous cosmology and worldview to empower and transform a management plan for Papah ā naumoku ā kea Marine. 28(3).
Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), pp. 1766-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
Renck, V., Ludwig, D., Santos, I. D. J., Celestino, V., Assis, F. De, Araújo, N. A. De, & Cardoso, C. (2023). Conhecimento Pesqueiro e o Defeso : Preenchendo uma Lacuna Necessária. 04(February). https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2023-02-12.04-1-8
Rivers, N., Celliers, L., Ro, L., Fernandes, M., & Snow, B. (2023). Stratification of stakeholders for participation in the governance of coastal social-ecological systems. 1418-1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-023-01844-1
Schick, A. (2018). People-Centered and Ecosystem-Based Knowledge Co-Production to Promote Proactive Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Namibia People-Centered and Ecosystem-Based Knowledge Co-Production to Promote Proactive Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Development in Namibia. Environmental Management, August. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1093-7
Sheng, C. (2020). Transforming exploitative land-based economy : The case of Borneo. Environmental Development, 33(March 2019), 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2019.100487
Singh, R. K., Singh, A., Zander, K. K., Mathew, S., & Kumar, A. (2021). Measuring successful processes of knowledge co-production for managing climate change and associated environmental stressors : Adaptation policies and practices to support Indian farmers. 282(June 2020).
Tafon, R., Glavovic, B., Saunders, F., Gilek, M., Tafon, R., Glavovic, B., Saunders, F., Oceans, M. G., Glavovic, B., Saunders, F., & Gilek, M. (2022). Oceans of Conflict : Pathways to an Ocean Sustainability PACT Oceans of Conflict : Pathways to an Ocean Sustainability PACT. Planning Practice & Research, 37(2), pp. 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2021.1918880
Tengö, M., Hill, R., Malmer, P., Raymond, C. M., Spierenburg, M., Danielsen, F., Elmqvist, T., & Folke, C. (2017). Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
Trimble, M., & La, M. (2014). Evaluation Criteria for Participatory Research : Insights from Coastal Uruguay. 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0276-0
Van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, pp. 445-477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850
Vogel, C., Scott, D., Culwick, C. E., Sutherland, C., Scott, D., Culwick, C. E., & Environmental, C. S. (2017). Environmental problem-solving in South Africa : harnessing creative imaginaries to address ‘ wicked ’ challenges and opportunities Environmental problem-solving in South Africa : harnessing creative imaginaries to address ‘ wicked ’ challenges and. South African Geographical Journal, 6245(February), 0. https://doi.org/10.1080/03736245.2016.1217256
Zarei, Z., Karami, E., & Keshavarz, M. (2020). Co-production of knowledge and adaptation to water scarcity in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 262(September 2019), 110283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110283
