Preliminary Objection Lodged In The Obligation To Negotiate Access To The Pacific Ocean Case (Bolivia V. Chile)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.201601.009

Keywords:

Preliminary objections, International Court of Justice (ICJ), obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean, Chile, Bolivia, Pact of Bogotá, 1904 Peace Treaty

Abstract

In the handling of the contentious proceedings before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) initiated by Bolivia against Chile, regarding the obligation to negotiate access to the Pacific Ocean, the latter State lodged a preliminary objection concerning the ICJ’s jurisdiction. The paper makes a brief analysis of the preliminary objections’ regulation in the Rules of the ICJ, summarizes the Chilean arguments that supported their objection to the ICJ’s jurisdiction, shows Bolivian counterarguments and presents both the arguments and the final decision of the ICJ. The document ends with the author’s comments on the position of the parties and the judgment of the ICJ.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Gattas Abugattas, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP), máster en Diplomacia y Relaciones Internacionales
    por la Escuela Diplomática de España y doctor en Derecho por la PUCP. Profesor ordinario asociado en el área de
    Derecho Internacional Público y Relaciones Internacionales en la PUCP. Correo electrónico: gabugattas@pucp.edu.pe

Downloads

Published

2016-09-23

Issue

Section

Jurisprudencia

How to Cite

Preliminary Objection Lodged In The Obligation To Negotiate Access To The Pacific Ocean Case (Bolivia V. Chile). (2016). Agenda Internacional, 23(34), 229-247. https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.201601.009