With or without ancestors? Validity of the ancestral in the Peruvian Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201401.004Keywords:
Amazon rainforest, ancestrality, awajún, ayahuasca, Convention 169, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, indigenous cosmologies, indigenous rights, political discourse, state, jurisprudence, leadership, political ontology, Peru, indigenous politics, territoryAbstract
The existence —or not— of the concept of ancestors in the indigenous Amazon has been the subject of much debate. However, regional leaders do not hesitate to call upon ‘ancestral’ knowledge, customs, or territories in the sense that, from an academic point of view, could appear enigmatic. «Ancestral, but… with or without ancestors?» is the question a confused anthropologist might ask. In this article, I propose to offer elements of a response to this question,based on a case study in Peru. First I analyze how Amazonian indigenous leaders, following international law, have adopted the legal notion of ‘ancestral possession’ of their territory to adapt it to the political sphere. This approach accounts for the recent generalization and uniformization of the term ‘ancestral’, but poses the problem of how it articulates with the indigenous cosmologies that it supposes to reflect. For this reason, I explore in the second section the pertinence of the category of ‘ancestor’ in the indigenous Amazon, briefly drawing upon the academic debate in order to define inwhat way this category takes on meaning. Based on testimony from an experienced Awajún leader, we thus return in the third section more explicitly to the different meanings and planes of reference that unfold when one uses the term ‘ancestral’, showing how Amazonian indigenous people not only adopt external conceptual elements and arguments, but also transform them based on their own cosmological singularities and political perspectives.
Downloads
References
Albert, B. (1988). Temps du sang, temps des cendres: représentation de la maladie, système rituel et espace politique chez les Yanomami du Sud-Est (Amazonie brésilienne). París: Éditions de l’Orstom.
Albert, B. (2004). Chamanisme et ethnopolitique: Fragments d’un discours yano-mami. L’Homme, 169, 217-218.
Anaya, S. J. y M. Campbell (2009). Gaining Legal Recognition of Indigenous Land Rights: The Story of the Awas Tingni Case in Nicaragua. En D. Hurwitz y M. L. Satterthwaite (eds.), Human rights advocacy stories. Nueva York: Founda-tion Press; Thomson/West.
Anaya, S. J. y C. Grossman (2002). The Case of Awas Tingni v. Nicaragua: A New Step in the International Law of Indigenous Peoples. Arizona Journal of Inter-national and Comparative Law, 19(1), 1-15.
Arizona Review of International and Comparative Law (2002). The Case of the Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community v. Nicaragua, 19(1).
Bellier, I. (1992). Le temps des Mai Huna. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 78(2), 39-46.Bellier, I. (2004). L’Organisation des Nations Unies et les Peuples Autochtones: La périphérie au centre de la mondialisation. Socio-anthropologie, 14.
Bellier, I. (2006). Identité globalisée et droits collectifs: les enjeux des peuples auto-chtones dans la constellation onusienne. Autrepart, 2(38), 99-118.
Bellier, I. (2011). L’anthropologie, l’indigène et les peuples autochtones. Conferencia Robert Hertz (no. 19) presentada por invitación de la Asociación para la Inves-tigación en Antropología Social (APRAS), París.
Bellier, I. (2012). Les peuples autochtones aux Nations Unies: un nouvel acteur dans la fabrique des normes internationales. Critique Internationale, 54, 61-80.
Bellier, I. (ed.). (2013). Peuples autochtones dans le monde: les enjeux de la recon-naissance. Paris: L’Harmattan.Brown, M. F. (1984). Una paz incierta: historia y cultura da las comunidades agua-runas frente al impacto da la carretera Marginal. Lima: CAAAP.
Brown, M. F. (2007). Tsewa’s Gift: Magic and Meaning in an Amazonian Society. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Carneiro da Cunha, M. (1978). Os mortos e os outros. Uma análise do sistema fune-rário e da noção de pessoa entre os índios krahó. São Paulo: Hucitec.
Carneiro da Cunha, M. (1981). Eschatology among the Krahó: reflection upon society, free field of fabulation. En S. C. Humphreys y H. King (eds.), Mortality and Immortality: The Anthropology and Archaeology of Death: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University, in June 1980 (pp. 161-174). Londres y Nueva York: Academic Press.
Carneiro da Cunha, M. (2010). Savoir traditionnel, droits intellectuels et dialectique de la culture. París: Éditions de l’Éclat.
Chaumeil, J.-P. (1993). Des Esprits aux ancêtres: Procédés linguistiques, concep-tion du langage et de la société chez les Yagua de l’Amazonie péruvienne. L’Homme, 33(126-128), 409-427.
Chaumeil, J.-P. (1997a). Entre la memoria y el olvido: observaciones sobre los ritos funerarios en las tierras bajas de América del Sur. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 1, 207-232.
Chaumeil, J.-P. (1997b). Les os, les flûtes, les morts. Mémoire et traitement funéraire en Amazonie. Journal de La Société Des Américanistes, 83(1), 83-110.
Chaumeil, J.-P. (2007). Bones, Flutes, and the Dead: Memory and Funeral Customs in the Amazon. En C. Fausto y M. Heckenberger (eds.), Time and Memory in Indigenous Amazonia: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 243-283). Gainesvi-lle: University Press of Florida.
CIDH (2009). Derechos de los pueblos indígenas y tribales sobre sus tierras ances-trales y recursos naturales (Nº OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 56/09). Washington D.C: Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH).
Clastres, H. (1968). Rites funéraires Guayaki. Journal de la Société des Américanis-tes, 57(1), 63-72.
Descola, P. (1986). La nature domestique: symbolisme et praxis dans l’écologie des Achuar. París: Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Descola, P. (2005). Par-delà nature et culture. París: Gallimard.
Descola, P. (2006). Les lances du crépuscule relations Jivaros Haute-Amazonie. París: Plon.Erikson, P. (1996). La griffe des aïeux: marquage du corps et démarquages ethniques chez les Matis d’Amazonie. París: Peeters.
Erikson, P. (2003). J.-C. Monde y J.-P. Razon (eds.). Nature sauvage, nature sauvée? Écologie et peuples autochtones. L’Homme, 166, 249-250.
Erikson, P. (2004a). Chamanisme, écriture et ethnopolitique. L’Homme, 171-172(3), 525-528.
Erikson, P. (2004b). La face cachée de l’ancestralité. Masques et affinité chez les Matis d’Amazonie brésilienne. Journal de la société des américanistes, 90(1), 119-142.
Fausto, C. (2002). Faire le mythe. Histoire, récit et transformation en Amazonie. Journal de la société des américanistes, 88, 69-90.
Fausto, C. y M. Heckenberger (eds.) (2007). Time and Memory in Indigenous Ama-zonia: Anthropological Perspectives. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
García Hierro, P. y A. Surrallés (2009). Antropología de un derecho: libre determina-ción territorial de los pueblos indígenas como derecho humano. Copenhague: IWGIA.
Gow, P. (1993). Gringos and Wild Indians: Images of History in Western Amazonian Cultures. L’Homme, 33(126/128), 327-347.
Gow, P. (1996). River People: Shamanism and History in Western Amazonia. En N. Thomas y C. Humphrey (eds.), Shamanism, history, and the state. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Gow, P. (2001). An Amazonian Myth and its History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greene, S. (2009). Customizing indigeneity: paths to a visionary politics in Peru. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Halbmayer, E. (2013). Securing a life for the dead among the Yukpa. The exhuma-tion ritual as a temporary synchronisation of worlds. Journal de la Société des Américanistes, 99(1), 105-140.
Hill, J. D. (1988). Rethinking History and Myth: Indigenous South American Pers-pectives on the Past. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hill, J. D. (2009). History, Power and Identity: Amazonian Perspectives. Acta Histó-rica Universitatis Klaipedensis, 19, 25-47.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwe-lling & Skill. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
Kopenawa, D. (2010). La chute du ciel: paroles d’un chaman yanomami. (B. Albert, Trans.). París: Plon.Lévi-Strauss, C. (2008). Oeuvres. París: Gallimard.
Mader, E. (1999). Metamorfosis del poder: persona, mito y visión en la sociedad Shuar y Achuar (Ecuador, Perú). Quito: Abya-Yala.
Morgan, R. (2004). Advancing Indigenous Rights at the United Nations: Strategic Framing and Its Impact on the Normative Development of International Law. Social & Legal Studies, 13(4), 481-500.
Morgan, R. (2007). On Political Institutions and Social Movement Dynamics: The Case of the United Nations and the Global Indigenous Movement. Interna-tional Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique, 28(3), 273-292.
Morgan, R. (2011). Transforming Law and Institution: Indigenous Peoples, the United Nations and Human Rights. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Rivière, P. (1984). Individual and Society in Guiana: A Comparative Study of Amerindian Social Organisation. Cambridge (Cambridgeshire), Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Rivière, P. (1993). The Amerindianization of Descent and Affinity. L’Homme, 33(126), 507-516.
Rodríguez Garavito, C. (2013). Más allá de la jurisprudencia: el impacto de los fallos judiciales sobre derechos sociales. En Malcom Langford (ed.), Teoría y juris-prudencia de los derechos sociales: tendencias emergentes en el derecho internacional comparado (pp. 897-916). Bogotá: Siglo del Hombre, Universi-dad de Los Andes, Facultad de Derecho.
Rubenstein, S. L. (2012). On the Importance of Visions among the Amazonian Shuar. Current Anthropology,53(1), 39-79.
Santos-Granero, F. (1998). Writing History into the Landscape: Space, Myth, and Ritual in Contemporary Amazonia. American Ethnologist, 25(2), 128-148.
Smith, R. C. (1996). La política de la diversidad: COICA y las federaciones étnicas de la Amazonía. En S. Varese (ed.), Pueblos indios, soberanía y globalismo(pp. 81-127). Quito: Abya-Yala.
Smith, R. C. (2002). A Tapestry Woven from the Vicissitudes of History, Place and Daily Life. Lima: Oxfam America.Surrallés, A. (s.f.). Human Rights for Non-human: Indigenous Peoples Rights and Animism. Manuscrito.
Surrallés, A. (2009). En el corazón del sentido: percepción, afectividad y acción en los candoshi (Alta Amazonía). Lima y Copenhague: IFEA / IWGIA.
Surrallés, A. y P. García Hierro (eds.) (2004). Tierra adentro. Territorio indígena y percepción del entorno. Copenhague: IWGIA.
Taylor, A.-C. (1993a). Des fantômes stupéfiants: langage et croyance dans la pensée achuar. L’Homme, 126-128, 429-447.Taylor, A.-C. (1993b). Remembering to Forget: Identity, Mourning and Memory Among the Jivaro. Man, 28(4), 653-678.
Taylor, A.-C. (1997). L’oubli des morts et la mémoire des meurtres. Expériences de l’histoire chez les Jivaro. Terrain. Revue d’ethnologie de l’Europe, 29, 83-96.
Taylor, A.-C. (2007). Sick of History: Contrasting Regimes of Historicity in the Upper Amazon. En C. Fausto y M. Heckenberger (eds.), Time and Memory in Indigenous Amazonia: Anthropological Perspectives (pp. 133-168). Gainesvi-lle: University Press of Florida.
Taylor, A.-C. (2009). Le corps de l’âme et ses états: Être et mourir en Amazonie. Terrain, 52.Tribunal Constitucional del Perú. Resolución 00024-2009-PI/TC (2011).
