Conservation and Indigenous resistance: Protected Areas and extractive agendas in the Peruvian Amazon

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003

Palavras-chave:

Protected Areas, Extractivism, Conservation, Indigenous, Amazonia, Hydrocarbon

Resumo

Expanding natural protected areas in the Peruvian Amazon compete with indigenous interests and resource extraction, in a dynamic process of endorsement and enforcement by local indigenous communities. The analysis presents a geographical case study of Peru’s emblematic Camisea gas extraction project in the Amazonian Lower Urubamba valley, Cusco. The focus is on two protected areas —Matsigenka Communal Reserve and Megantoni National Sanctuary— that were created alongside the gas project in the early 2000s, strategically supported by local indigenous communities. The study argues that the intersections of extractive and conservation agendas in Camisea have created ambiguous and novel spaces for the expression of local indigenous agendas, while neoliberal conservation territorial logics simultaneously limit them. This empirical analysis contributes to a deeper empirical understanding of Indigenous conservation priorities, political demands, and long-term strategies regarding territorial and legal categories of conservation, carefully negotiated within highly fragmented and weak formal institutional state arrangements in the Peruvian Amazon.

Downloads

Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.

Biografia do Autor

  • Ana Watson Jimenez, University of Calgary

    PhD candidate in Geography at the University of Calgary, Canada.
    e-mail: ana.watson1@ucalgary.ca

  • Conny Davidsen, University of Calgary

    Associate Professor in the Geography Department at the University of Calgary, Canada.
    e-mail: davidsen@ucalgary.ca

Downloads

Publicado

2022-06-09

Como Citar

Conservation and Indigenous resistance: Protected Areas and extractive agendas in the Peruvian Amazon. (2022). Debates en Sociología, 54, 77-113. https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003