Arbitral Precedent: Still Exploring the Path II

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18800/rmdpro.202601.002

Mots-clés :

Arbitral precedent, Binding precedent, Nature of arbitration, Theory of precedent, Philosophy of law, Decision-making, Legal pragmatism

Résumé

The study of arbitral awards is still somewhat obscure when it comes to their ability to form precedents to future arbitrators and state court judges. In contrast, the study of the decision-making process itself is still very much insufficient when it comes to arbitration, mainly because the arbitrator’s duties when deciding are still not obvious. In this text we further our attempt at construing a theory of precedent that is consonant to our idea of law.

Téléchargements

Les données de téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponible.

Biographies de l'auteur-e

  • Paula Costa e Silva, University of Lisbon

    Profesora catedrática de la Universidade de Lisboa.
    Contacto: paulacostaesilvaarb@gmail.com

  • Beatriz de Macedo Vitorino, University of Lisbon

    Doctoranda en Ciencias Jurídicas en la Universidade de Lisboa.
    Contacto: beatrizmacedovitorino@gmail.com

  • Filipa Lira de Almeida, University of Lisbon

    Maestranda en Derecho y Ciencias Jurídicas con especialidad en Derecho Civil de la Universidade de Lisboa.
    Contacto: filipalira@fd.ulisboa.pt

Téléchargements

Publié

2026-08-18

Numéro

Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026)

Rubrique

Estudios

Licence

Licence Creative Commons

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.

Comment citer

Arbitral Precedent: Still Exploring the Path II. (2026). Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal, 11(1), 74-109. https://doi.org/10.18800/rmdpro.202601.002