Arbitral Precedent: Still Exploring the Path II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/rmdpro.202601.002Palavras-chave:
Arbitral precedent, Binding precedent, Nature of arbitration, Theory of precedent, Philosophy of law, Decision-making, Legal pragmatismResumo
The study of arbitral awards is still somewhat obscure when it comes to their ability to form precedents to future arbitrators and state court judges. In contrast, the study of the decision-making process itself is still very much insufficient when it comes to arbitration, mainly because the arbitrator’s duties when deciding are still not obvious. In this text we further our attempt at construing a theory of precedent that is consonant to our idea of law.
Downloads
Os dados de download ainda não estão disponíveis.
Downloads
Publicado
2026-08-18
Edição
Seção
Estudios
Licença

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Como Citar
Arbitral Precedent: Still Exploring the Path II. (2026). Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal, 11(1), 74-109. https://doi.org/10.18800/rmdpro.202601.002