Prior consultation in extractive activities: An analysis of the balance and proposals ten years after its application in Peru

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202201.009

Keywords:

Prior consultation, Indigenous people, Mining, Hydrocarbons, Extractive activities

Abstract

Prior consultation is one of the most important instruments for the relationship between the State and the indigenous peoples. Prior consultation is also a key right for the survival and respect for the ways of life of indigenous peoples. This right is included in ILO Convention 169 and calls on the State Party to sit down face to face with indigenous peoples before issuing an administrative or legislative measure that may affect them.
However, prior consultation is not only a right, but also an administrative procedure. It is there where the procedure has presented several improvable and perfectible factors. In the following article, we will analyze a series of elements of the prior consultation processes that need to be improved, focusing on the field of extractive activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Richard O’Diana Rocca, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) y magíster en Comunicación Política e Institucional por la Universidad Pompeu Fabra de Barcelona. Se licenció con una tesis de grado sobre la propiedad de recursos naturales en las comunidades campesinas del Perú. Ha sido coordinador del proyecto de ambición climática en el Movimiento Ciudadano frente al Cambio Climático (MOCICC) y asesor de la bancada del Frente Amplio en el Congreso de la República. Actualmente es profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP y de la Escuela de Postgrado de la Universidad Antonio Ruiz de Montoya.
    richard.odiana.rocca@gmail.com

Published

2022-05-25

Issue

Section

Misceláneas

How to Cite

Prior consultation in extractive activities: An analysis of the balance and proposals ten years after its application in Peru. (2022). Derecho & Sociedad, 58, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18800/dys.202201.009