The “solve and repete” rule in Administrative sanctioning law in Argentina

Authors

  • Lucas A. Piaggio Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina image/svg+xml

Keywords:

National constitution, International conventions of human rights, Solve et repete, Administrative fine, Administrative and judicial control, Presumption of innocence, Defense in trial

Abstract

The author analyzes the validity of the legal requirement to pay an administrative fine as an assumption to be submitted to administrative or judicial review by the appellant. To this end, the author explores the origin of solve et repete in tax law, and its transposition to the administrative penalty law. In this regard, he proves that this legal obligation is incompatible not only with the Argentine Constitution, but also with international human rights treaties in force in the region. Finally, he arrives to such conclusion regardless of the position taken on the legal nature of administrative fines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Lucas A. Piaggio, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina

    Profesor de Derecho Administrativo de la Pontifica Universidad Católica Argentina. Contacto: lpiaggio@nyc.com.ar

Downloads

Published

2020-07-21

Issue

No. 54 (2020): Tomo I

Section

Derecho Administrativo Sancionador

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

The “solve and repete” rule in Administrative sanctioning law in Argentina. (2020). Derecho & Sociedad, 1(54), 291-306. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/22421