Continuous assessment of graduate attributes in engineering: a model based on the PDCA cycle and interactive monitoring
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202602.A005Keywords:
Competencies, Evaluation, Dashboard, Engineering, Continuous Improvement, Graduate AttributesAbstract
This paper addresses the implementation of a system for the continuous assessment of Graduate Attributes (GA) in an engineering program, using an interactive dashboard as a support tool to facilitate decision-making aimed at improving the graduate profile. The approach is based on experiential learning, formative assessment, and the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle. The methodology comprised four phases: planning the assessment through curriculum mapping and goal definition; applying assessment tools in core courses over two semesters; verifying results via the dashboard; and implementing corrective actions. Results demonstrate improvements in five of six GA, alongside the identification of internal gaps in attributes that met their overall goal. In conclusion, this system functions as a robust management tool that tracks competency achievement and provides evidence to support continuous improvement and accreditation processes.
Downloads
References
Cabrera, A., Colbeck, C., & Terenzini, P. (2001). Developing Performance Indicators for Assessing Classroom Teaching Practices and Student Learning. Research in Higher Education, 42, 327-352. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018874023323
Cano, E. (2015). Las rúbricas como instrumento de evaluación de competencias en educación superior: ¿uso o abuso? Profesorado. Revista de Currículum y Formación de Profesorado, 19(2), 265-280. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/567/56741181017.pdf
Consejo de Acreditación de la Enseñanza de la Ingeniería A.C. (Cacei). (2020). Marco de Referencia 2018 para la acreditación de programas de Ingeniería. Criterios e indicadores. [P-CACEI-DAC-03-DI03, versión 03]. Consejo para la Acreditación de la Educación Superior, A.C. https://cacei.org.mx/nv/nvdocs/marco_ing_2018.pdf
Curay Carrera, P. A. (2022). El aprendizaje colaborativo: una respuesta para la enseñanza con herramientas virtuales. Revista Educare, 26(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v26i3.1805
Damm Muñoz, X. P., Villena Pavez, L.C., Saavedra, J.H., Gutiérrez-Saldivia, X., Sáez San Martin, D. E., & Moya Figueroa, B. A. (2024). Percepciones de los estudiantes sobre la diversificación de estrategias en la formación inicial docente. Espacios, 45(6), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.48082/espacios-a24v45n06p09
Guerra Santana, M., Rodríguez Pulido, J. & Artiles Rodríguez, (2019). Aprendizaje colaborativo: experiencia innovadora en el alumnado universitario. Rexe, Revista de estudios y experiencias en educación, 18(36), 269-281. https://dx.doi.org/10.21703/rexe.20191836guerra5
Henri, M., Johnson, M., & Nepal, B. (2017). A Review of CompetencyBased Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(4), 607-638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20180
Leandro-Cruz, M., Saunders-Smits, G., & Groen, P. (2019). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45, 729-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1671810
Leo, A., Maranto, A., Fanjaya, F., & Supriyadi, J. (2022). Academic Dashboard For Monitoring KPI Based Using Data Feeder Dikti. Journal Bit-Tech, 4(3), 139-145. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v4i3.442
Marin-Garcia, J.A., & Santandreu-Mascarell, C. (2015). ¿Qué sabemos sobre el uso de rúbricas en la evaluación de asignaturas universitarias? Intangible Capital, 11(1), 118-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.538
Moozeh, K., Frank, B., & Maw, S. (17-21, junio 2023). A systematic review of drivers and barriers to competency-based undergraduate engineering education. En Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), Kelowna, British Columbia, Canadá. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.2023.17148
Morris, T. (2019). Experiential learning - a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064-1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
Pachano Azuaje, F. & Gutiérrez Altuve, K. (2014). Propuesta metodológica para evaluar el desempeño de profesionales en el mercado laboral. Caso Ingeniería de Sistemas. Educere, 18(59), 61-72. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/356/35631103007.pdf
Roselli, N.D. (2016). El aprendizaje colaborativo: Bases teóricas y estrategias aplicables en la enseñanza universitaria. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 219-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2016.v4n1.90
Rita, S., & Kalyanaraman, L. (2009). Mechanics of How to Apply Deming’s PDCA Cycle to Management Education. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1353763
Samuel, S., & Farrer, H. (2025). Integrating the PDCA cycle for continuous improvement and academic quality enhancement in higher education. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 17(2), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.32674/yzwgmy25
Sedrakyan, G., Malmberg, J., Verbert, K., Järvelä, S., & Kirschner, P. (2020). Linking learning behavior analytics and learning science concepts: Designing a learning analytics dashboard for feedback to support learning regulation. Computers in Human Behavior, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2018.05.004
Sanchez-Lopez, E., Kasongo, J., Gonzalez-Sanchez, A., & Mostrady, A. (2023). Implementation of Formative Assessment in Engineering Education. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(1), 43-53. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i1.154
Schildkamp, K., Kleij, F., Heitink, M., Kippers, W., & Veldkamp, B. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Higher Education, 45, 477-501. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023967026413
Yurkofsky, M., Peterson, A., Mehta, J., Horwitz-Willis, R., & Frumin, K. (2020). Research on Continuous Improvement: Exploring the Complexities of Managing Educational Change. Review of Research in Education, 44, 403-433. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20907363
Zambrano Loor, T. M., González Aportela, O., Vélez Villavicencio, C.E., & Molina Villacís, P.M. (2024). Línea base de Vinculación con la Sociedad, articulando contexto y pertinencia de la Educación Superior. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 16(2), 11-23, https://rus.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/rus/article/view/4230
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Educacion
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
