Estilos de Liderança e Acreditação em Programas Acadêmicos Universitários
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202601.A013Palavras-chave:
Estilos de liderança, Acreditação, Apoio organizacional, Ensino superiorResumo
Este estudo teve como objetivo determinar a relação entre estilos de liderança e o progresso da acreditação, tendo o apoio organizacional como variável mediadora. Adotou-se uma abordagem quantitativa, com delineamento não experimental e caráter descritivo-correlacional. A amostra foi composta por 126 professores efetivos que exerciam cargos de gestão em 21 faculdades. Os instrumentos utilizados foram o questionário MLQ Leader Form, o instrumento CEAI de avaliação do apoio organizacional e o Questionário de Progresso da Acreditação. A validade de conteúdo foi estabelecida por meio de julgamento de especialistas, com concordância avaliada pelo coeficiente W de Kendall. A confiabilidade foi verificada pelo coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Os resultados indicam que o apoio organizacional exerce um papel mediador, fortalecendo a relação entre estilos de liderança e o progresso da acreditação.
Downloads
Referências
Alkhateeb, H., & Romanowski, M. (2021).Identifying administrators’ and faculty’s perspectives regarding CAEP accreditation in a College of Education: Q methodology research. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101004
Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A., & Sternberg, R. (2004). Leadership: past, present, and future. En J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3-16). Sage Publications, Inc.
Ashfaq, F., Abid, G., & Ilyas, S. (2023). Transformational leadership and life satisfaction: The sequential mediation model of organizational trust and proactive behavior. Scandinavian Journal of Management 39(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101298
Avolio, B., & Bass, B. (1995). Multifactor Leadership QuestionnaireTM Form 5X-Short Instrument Leader Form, Rater Form, & Scoring Guide. Mind Garden, Inc.
Avolio, B., Walumbwa, F. & Weber, T. (2009). Leadership: Current Theories, Research and Future Directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Basar, U., Sigri, U., & Basim, N. (2020). Transactional leadership. En O. Demirtas & M. Karaca, Handbook Leadership Styles (pp. 102-125). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Free Press.
Bass, B., Avolio, B., Jung, D., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting Unit Performance by Assessing Transformational and Transactional Leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology by the American Psychological Association, 88(2), 207-218. http://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207
Bickes, D., & Gilmaz, C. (2020). Leadership Theories. En O. Demirtas & M. Karaca, Handbook Leadership Styles (pp. 1-34). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Cai, Q., Wu, J., Wu, T., Chang, P., & Mardani, A. (2024). The impact of digital leadership on hidden champions’ competitive advantage: A moderated mediation model of ambidextrous innovation and value co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114819
Chênevert, D., Vandenberghe, C., Doucet, O., & Ben, A. (2013). Passive leadership, role stressors, and affective organizational commitment: A time-lagged study among health care employees. European Review of Applied Psychology, 63(5), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2013.07.002
Chun-Chang, L., Wen-Chih, Y., Zheng, Y., & Xiau-Chi, L. (2023). The relationships between leader emotional intelligence, transformational leadership, and transactional leadership and job performance: A mediator model of trust. Heliyon-CellPress, 9(8), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18007
Griffin, R., &Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations (11a ed.). Cengage Learning.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (2012). Controversias paradigmáticas, contradicciones y consecuencias emergentes. En N. Denzin & Y Lincoln, Y., Paradigmas y perspectivas en disputa. Manual de investigación cualitativa (Vol. II., pp. 38-78). Editorial Gedisa.
Champoux, J. (2010). Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations (4a ed.). Routledge.
Demirtas, O., Karaka, M., & Derindag, F. (2020). Ethical leadership. En O. Demirtas & M., Karaca, Handbook Leadership Styles (pp. 60-83). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Derindag, O. (2020). Transformational leadership. En O. Demirtas & M. Karaca (Eds.), Handbook Leadership Styles. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Faruk, O., Ersan, G., & Natkiyok, A. (2014). Effect of leadership estule perceived organizational performance and innovation: The role of transformational leadership beyond the impact of transactional leadership-an application among turkish SMEs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 881-889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.097
Feng, T., Si, Z., Jiang, W., &Tang, J. (2024). Supply chain transformational leadership and resilience: the mediating role of ambidextrous business model. Humanities And Social Sciences Communications, 11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03099-x
Hasan, M., & Jin, J. (2024). The relationship between ethnocentric behaviour and workforce localisation success: The mediating role of knowledge sharing tendency. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2024.100245
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis. A regression based approach. The Guilford Press.
Hayes, A., & Scharkow, M. (2018). The Relative Trustworthiness of Inferential Tests of the Indirect Effect in Statistical Mediation Analysis: Does Method Really Matter? Psychological Science 24(10) 1918-1927. http://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613480187
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2013). Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw-Hill; Interamericana Editores.
Hornsby, J., Kuratko, D., & Zahra, S. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 253-273.
Jaboob, M., Mohsin; A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Sustaining employees’ creativity through the organizational justice: The mediating role of leadership styles. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100693
Jameel, A. & Ahmad, A. (2019). Leadership and Performance of Academic Staff in Developing Countries. The 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, pp. 6101-6106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432988
Judge, T. , & Piccolo, R. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 755-768.
Klein, G. (2023). Transformational and transactional leadership, organizational support and environmental competition intensity as antecedents of intrapreneurial behaviors. European research on management and business economics, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100215
Kuratko, D., Hornsby, J., & Mckelvie, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial mindset in corporate entrepreneurship: Forms, impediments, and actions for research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61, 132-154 https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907585
Kuratko, D., Hornsby, J., & Covin, J. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57, 37-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.08.009
López; J. (2004). La acreditación universitaria en el Perú. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 35, 1-10.
Luo, J., Mu, X., & Zhang, Q. (2025). Is non-intervention feasible? How laissez-faire leadership moderates the relationship between AI usage and service employee empathetic creativity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2024.104074
Martínez, M., Tuya, L., Martínez, M., Pérez, A., & Cánovas, A. (2009). El coeficiente de correlación de los rangos de Spearman caracterización. Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas, 8(2), 1-19
Mendoza, M., & Ortiz, C. (2006). El Liderazgo Transformacional, Dimensiones e Impacto en la Cultura Organizacional y Eficacia de las Empresas. Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. XIV(1), 118-134.
Morgan, P. (22-23 de octubre de 2015). Palabras de Peregrina Morgan, presidenta del Consejo Directivo Ad Hoc del SINEACE. En Sistema Nacional de Evaluación, Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad Educativa - SINEACE. Puente de mejora continua (pp. 13-19). SINEACE.
Romanowsky, M., & Alkhateeb, H. (2020). The McDonaldization of CAEP accreditation and teacher education programs abroad. Teaching and Teacher Education, 90, 103028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103028
Sistema Nacional de Evaluación, Acreditación y Certificación de la Calidad Educativa (Sineace). (2016). Modelo de Acreditación para Programas de Estudios de Educación Superior Universitaria.
Vroom, V., & Jago, A. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17-24.
Zhang, L., Qiu, Y., & Teng, E. (2017). Cross-level relationships between justice climate and organizational citizenship behavior: perceived organizational support as mediator. Social Behavior and Personality, 45(3), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.4842
Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., Jiang, J. (2024). ¿Can organizations shape eco-friendly employees? Organizational support improves pro-environmental behaviors at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102200
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
Direitos autorais (c) 2026 Educacion
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
