International Arbitration under debate

Authors

  • Victoria Narancio Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.
  • Fabio Núñez del Prado Pontifical Catholic University of Peru image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.019

Keywords:

International Arbitration, Commercial Arbitration, Investment Arbitration, New York Convention, Arbitral Seat, Arbitral Award

Abstract

Is the choice of the arbitral seat still an important decision in international arbitration? Should arbitral awards be subject to greater judicial scrutiny? Should the appeal be in international arbitration? Is it possible that an annulled arbitral award is recognized under the New York Convention? Should the New York Convention be amended to achieve CNY 2.0? Is investment arbitration a system that works? Are the criticisms of investment arbitration valid? In this interview, Gary Born responds to each of these questions by addressing many controversial current issues in international arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Victoria Narancio, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP.

    Miembro del grupo de arbitraje internacional.

  • Fabio Núñez del Prado, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
    Profesor de la Universidad Católica del Perú.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-13

Issue

No. 54 (2017)

Section

Puntos de Vista

License

Copyright (c) 2017 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

International Arbitration under debate. (2017). IUS ET VERITAS, 54, 340-348. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.019