Evidentiary errors in tax law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.015

Keywords:

Evidence, Evidentiary reasoning, Assessment of evidence, Standard of proof, Burden of proof, Evidentiary errors

Abstract

The aims of this paper are: (i) at a conceptual level, to present a typology (not exhaustive) of evidentiary errors that usually occur in tax proceedings and processes in Peru, grouped according to the stages of the evidentiary activity where they occur, and to propose a terminological apparatus to describe with greater explanatory power what happens when a decision is made on the factual premise in tax proceedings and processes. Similarly, (ii) with regards to the dogmatic dimension, an examination shall be undertaken to scrutinize the legal ramifications ensuing from these errors, in strict accordance with the prevailing legal framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • César Alejandro Dávila Alvarado, CMS Grau

    Abogado por la Universidad de Piura (Piura, Perú). Maestrando del programa “Global Rule of Law & Constitutional Democracy” por la Universidad de Génova.
    Correo electrónico: mdabogados.cdavila@gmail.com.

Published

2023-08-16

Issue

Section

General Section

How to Cite