Contractual formalities in modern contracting. No oral modification clauses and the doctrine of venire contra factum proprium as a limit to its enforceability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202302.003

Keywords:

Contractual formalities, Contract law, No oral modification clause, Venire contra factum propium, Civil Law, Chile

Abstract

Although the principle of consensualism is still the general rule in modern contracting, it is common, especially in complex and long-term commercial contracts, to include clauses limiting the parties’ freedom to modify or terminate them, unless certain formalities are observed. In this context, this paper analyses the so-called “no oral modification” clauses, putting forward the arguments for accepting their enforceability, as well as their limits, by means of the application of the doctrine of venire contra factum proprium.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Rodrigo Momberg Uribe, Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso

    Abogado por la Universidad Austral de Chile (Valdivia, Chile). LL.M. en European Contract Law y PhD por la Universidad de Utrecht. Profesor de Derecho civil en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso. Correo electrónico: rodrigo.momberg@pucv.cl.

  • Gonzalo Severin Fuster, Pontifical Catholic University of Valparaíso

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Valparaíso, Chile). Máster en Derecho empresarial y Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Madrid, España). Profesor de Derecho civil en la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso.
    Correo electrónico: gonzalo.severin@pucv.cl.

Published

2023-12-29

Issue

Section

Main Section

How to Cite

Contractual formalities in modern contracting. No oral modification clauses and the doctrine of venire contra factum proprium as a limit to its enforceability. (2023). IUS ET VERITAS, 67, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202302.003