Approaches to learning does matter to predict academic achievement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202202.010

Keywords:

Students’ approaches to learning, Achievement, Intelligence, Incremental validity, CART algorithm

Abstract

Meta-analyses show that the correlations of approaches to learning with academic achievement are low. However, only one study has controlled these correlations in the presence of intelligence. Our study investigates the incremental validity of the surface and deep approaches taking cognitive abilities as control and applied the multiple linear regression and CART regression tree method in a diversified sample of high school students from Minas Gerais, Brazil. We found a prediction of 20.37% and 35.20% of the outcome variance, through the linear regression and CART, respectively. Our results show that although cognitive abilities are more important than students’ approaches, the approaches have incremental validity and important roles as predictors of academic achievement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Cristiano Mauro Assis Gomes, Federal University of Minas Gerais

    cristianomaurogomes@gmail.com

  • Heitor Blesa Farias, Federal University of Minas Gerais

    heitorblesa@gmail.com

  • Enio Galinkin Jelihovschi, State University of Santa Cruz

    eniojelihovs@gmail.com

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Approaches to learning does matter to predict academic achievement. (2022). Revista de Psicología, 40(2), 905-933. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202202.010