Personal defenses of the respondent in executive procedures: A incoherence between Peruvian Code of Civil Procedure and Securities Law

Authors

  • Arturo Saúl Grau Castillo Pontifical Catholic University of Peru image/svg+xml
  • Álvaro Castillo Yarlequé Pontifical Catholic University of Peru image/svg+xml

Keywords:

Securities, executive process, defense, effectiveness of the process, regulatory incoherence

Abstract

The authors stress that the Peruvian executive process is not in accordance with the new constitutional scene since adopts a classical execution model that does not fulfill the right to a full defense in its balance with the effectiveness of the process. Therefore, they observe that this type of execution is not according to the subsection 2 of article 19 of the Peruvian Securities Act, which allows initiating a discussion based on personal defenses, even when the article 690-D of the Peruvian Civil Procedure Code prohibits it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Arturo Saúl Grau Castillo, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

    Egresado de la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP. Ex miembro del Semillero de Derecho Procesal de la PUCP.
    Contacto: arturograu7@hotmail.com

  • Álvaro Castillo Yarlequé, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

    Estudiante del duodécimo ciclo de la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP. Miembro del Grupo de Investigación PRODEJUS-PUCP.
    Contacto: alvaro.castillo@pucp.pe

Downloads

Published

2020-08-20

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020)

Section

Estudios y Notas

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Personal defenses of the respondent in executive procedures: A incoherence between Peruvian Code of Civil Procedure and Securities Law. (2020). Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal, 8(1), 239-263. https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoprocesal/article/view/22582