From fiction to reality: reflections surrounding fictional characters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201501.009Keywords:
fictional characters, copyright, intellectual propertyAbstract
The growth and development of worldwide products and services containing fictional characters has been exponential due to development, among others, of technology. This article examines the protection of fictional characters through copyright and reflects on its legal treatment.
Downloads
References
Cavalier v. Random House, Inc. 297 F.3d 815 (2002). Consulta: 3 de marzo de 2015.
Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo (UNCTAD). Informe sobre la economía creativa 2008 (http://unctad.org/es/Docs/ditc20082ceroverview_sp.pdf).
Donaldson, Michael C (2008). Clearance & Copyright. Los Angeles:
Fuente: http://time.com/3612615/influential-characters-2014/.
Fuente: http://time.com/3612615/influential-characters-2014/.
Fuente: http://time.com/3612615/influential-characters-2014/.
Fuente: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlg45edmmd/1-scrooge-mcduck/.
Fuente: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlg45edmmd/2-smaug/.
Fuente: http://www.forbes.com/pictures/mlg45edmmd/3-carlisle-cullen-2/.
Informe de la Dirección Nacional de Derecho de Autor de Colombia (http://www.cecolda.org.co/images/noticias/dic2014/Documento2.pdf), p. 4.
Kurtz, Leslie (2013). Fictional Characters and Real People. University of Louisville Law Review, 51, 435. (http://www.louisvillelawreview.org/sites/louisvillelawreview.org/files/pdfs/printcontent/51/3/Kurtz.pdf), 443. Consulta: 19 de marzo de 2015.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer vs. American Honda Motor Co (1995). 900 F. Supp. 1287 .
Nichols vs. Universal Pictures Corporation Et Al (1930). 45 f.2d 119 . (http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/IP/1930%20Nichols.pdf).
Pronunciamiento emitido en el caso Burroughs vs. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer. 519 F. Supp 388 (1981), Corte Distrital de Nueva York. Traducción libre.
Raja Pocket Books vs. Radha Pocket Books. 1997 (40) DRJ 791 (http://indiankanoon.org/doc/1572079/).
Resolución 367-2011/CDA-INDECOPI de fecha 1 de agosto de 2011.
Rice v. Fox Broad. Co. 330 F.3d 1170 (2003) (http://openjurist.org/330/f3d/1170/rice-v-fox-broadcasting-company-srj-e)
Rodríguez García, Gustavo (2013). Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en las industrias del entretenimiento. En: Autores varios. Los retos actuales de la propiedad intelectual: visión latinoamericana. Lima: Themis, p. 240.
Schienke, Gregory SI (2005). The Spawn of Learned Hand-A Reexamination of Copyright Protection and Fictional Characters: How Distinctly Delineated Must the Story Be Told? Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 9, 1, p. 73.
Silman-James Press.
Stoyano Edissonov, Emil. Merchandising de personajes audiovisuales de ficción: hacer negocios de los Jedi, Bart Simpson y Pocoyo (http://www.copyrait.com/archivo/28.pdf ).
Téllez, Oscar. ¿Quién es titular de los derechos del personaje de «La Chilindrina»? (http://abogadotellez.blogspot.com/2013/07/quien-es-titular-de-los-derechos-del.html).
Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. vs. Columbia Broad. Sys., Inc. 216 F.2d 945.
Zahr K. Fixing Copyright in Characters: Literary Perspectives on a Legal Problem (2013) . Cardozo Law Review, 35. (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2246511), pp. 807-808..
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
