Conscientious objection and abortion in Chile
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.004Keywords:
Conscientious objection, Sexual and reproductive rights, Abortion, Pseudo-objection, Bbioethical problemAbstract
This paper critically analyzes conscientious objection in the context of the new regulation of pregnancy termination in Chile. It affirms that adequate regulation should not be blind to the hostile context in which abortion rights have been enacted and the difficulties experienced. The bioethical requirements that seek to balance the interests involved must consider the legal regulation of the interests at stake, the context in which they are implemented and, fundamentally, the effectiveness of the solutions adopted. Attention should be paid to the risks involved in the proliferation of objections that are not serious and to the political use of conscientious objection to prevent the implementation of women’s reproductive rights. In describing the process of entrenchment, strengthening and expansion of the conscientious objection in Chile, we show how this process has overprotected consciousness and the risks of undermining the effectiveness of the new abortion law, hindering and dilating the enjoyment of rights entrenched by the law. In response, regulatory measures are proposed to reverse this situation, which are obtained mainly from the bioethical literature on the subject and that look at the adverse context of the guarantee of women’s sexual and reproductive rights.
Downloads
References
Bergallo, P. (2016). La lucha contra las normas informales que regulaban el aborto en la Argentina. En Rebecca J. Cook, Joanna N. Erdman & Bernard N. Dickens (eds.), El aborto en el derecho transnacional: casos y controversias (pp. 187-216). México D. F: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Brock, D. W. (2008). Conscientious refusal by physicians and pharmacists: Who is obligated to do what, and why? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 29(3), 187- 200. doi: https://doi.org/10/dr5bqr
Cabal, L., Olaya, M. A., & Robledo, V. M. (2014). Striking a balance: Conscientious objection and reproductive health care from the Colombian perspective. Health and Human Rights, 16(2), 73-83.
Casas, L. (2009). Invoking conscientious objection in reproductive health care: Evolving issues in Peru, Mexico and Chile. Reproductive Health Matters, 17(34), 78-87. doi: https://doi.org/10/dxj3cq
Chavkin, W., Leitman, L., & Polin, K. (2013). Conscientious objection and refusal to provide reproductive healthcare: A White Paper examining prevalence, health consequences, and policy responses. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123(S3), S41-S56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020- 7292(13)60002-8
Childress, J. F. (1985). Civil Disobedience, Conscientious Objection, and Evasive Noncompliance: A Framework for the Analysis and Assessment of Illegal Actions in Health Care. The Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 10(1), 63-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/10.1.63
Coppola, F., Briozzo, L., Nozar, F., Fiol, V., & Greif, D. (2016). Conscientious objection as a barrier for implementing voluntary termination of pregnancy in Uruguay: Gynecologists’ attitudes and behavior. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 134(S1), S16-S19. doi: https://doi.org/10/f84j4t
Corporación Humanas. (2019). Implementación de la ley N° 21.030 que regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales: Objeción de conciencia en hospitales públicos y en instituciones y su impacto en el ejercicio de derechos de las mujeres y niñas. Recuperado de: http://www.humanas.cl/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/HUMANAS-Estudio-Objeción-Conciencia-Ley-IVE-Tres-Causales-Anexo-Julio-2018.pdf
Deza, S. (2017). Objeción de conciencia y aborto: creencias propias, violencias ajenas. Revista de Bioética y Derecho: publicación del Máster en bioética y derecho, (39), 23-52. Recuperado de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/783/78349731003.pdf
De Zordo, S., & Mishtal, J. (2011). Physicians and Abortion: Provision, Political Participation and Conflicts on the Ground—The Cases of Brazil and Poland. Women’s Health Issues: Official Publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women’s Health, 21(3-suplemento), S32-S36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2011.01.006
Dickens, B. M., & Cook, R. J. (2000). The scope and limits of conscientious objection. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 71(1), 71-77. doi: https://doi.org/10/dxqvbf
Faúndes, A., Alves, G., & Duarte, M. J. (2013). Conscientious objection or fear of social stigma and unawareness of ethical obligations. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 123(S3), S57-S59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60003-X
Fiala, C., & Arthur, J. H. (2017). There is no defence for ‘Conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 216, 254-258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.023
Fiala, C., Gemzell Danielsson, K., Heikinheimo, O., Guðmundsson, J. A., & Arthur, J. (2016). Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing ‘conscientious objection’ in reproductive health care. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care, 21(3), 201-206. doi: https://doi.org/10/f3vbv4
Fink, L. R., Stanhope, K. K., Rochat, R. W., & Bernal, O. A. (2016). “The Fetus Is My Patient, Too”: Attitudes Toward Abortion and Referral Among Physician Conscientious Objectors in Bogotá, Colombia. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 42(2), 71-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1363/42e1016
Harris, L. F., Halpern, J., Prata, N., Chavkin, W., & Gerdts, C. (2018). Conscientious objection to abortion provision: Why context matters. Global Public Health, 13(5), 556-566. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h9x
Lampert, M. (2019). Aplicación de la Ley N° 21.030 que regula la despenalización de la interrupción voluntaria del embarazo en tres causales. Recuperado de: https://www.bcn.cl/obtienearchivo?id=repositorio/10221/27530/1/BCN_aplicacion_de_la_ley_de_aborto_marco_legal_datos_Final.pdf
Magelssen, M. (2012). When should conscientious objection be accepted? Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(1), 18-21. doi: https://doi.org/10/b62vt9
Minerva, F. (2015). Conscientious objection in Italy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(2), 170-173. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h96
Montero, A., & Villarroel, R. (2018). A critical review of conscientious objection and decriminalisation of abortion in Chile. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(4), 279-283. doi: https://doi.org/10/gcsq5c
Montero, A., Vergara, J., Ríos, M., & Villarroel, R. (2017). La objeción de conciencia en el debate sobre la despenalización del aborto por tres causales en Chile. Revista chilena de obstetricia y ginecología, 82(4), 350-360. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h95
Nuñez, M. (2016). Convicciones éticas institucionales y objeción de conciencia colectiva en el sector sanitario público y privado. En Lidia Casas Becerra & Delfina Lawson (comps.), Debates y reflexiones en torno a la despenalización del aborto en Chile. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Derechos Humanos UDP.
Ortiz-Millán, G. (2018). Abortion and conscientious objection: Rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context. Global Bioethics, 29(1), 1-15. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h94
Paredes, F. (2018). Aborto, deferencia y activismo judicial: comentario de la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional rol N° 3729-2007, de 28 de agosto de 2017. Ius et Praxis, 24(3), 803-816. doi: https://doi.org/10/ggfhnz
Savulescu, J. (2006). Conscientious objection in medicine. BMJ, 332, 294-297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7536.294
Schuklenk, U. (2015). Conscientious Objection in Medicine: Private Ideological Convictions must not Supercede Public Service Obligations. Bioethics, 29(5), ii-iii. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h93
Stulberg, D. B., Jackson, R. A., & Freedman, L. R. (2016). Referrals for Services Prohibited In Catholic Health Care Facilities. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48(3), 111-117. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6h92
Sulmasy, D. P. (2008). What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 29(3), 135-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-008-9072-2
Uberoi, D., & Galli, B. (2017). In Pursuit of a Balance: The Regulation of Conscience and Access to Sexual Reproductive Health Care. Human Rights Review, 18(3), 283-304. doi: https://doi.org/10/gf6jbb
Vélez, A. C., & Urbano, L. (2016). Improper Use of Conscientious Objection in Bogotá, Colombia, Presentess a Barrier to Safe, Legal Abortion Care. Colombia: Grupo Médico por el Derecho a Decidir (Global Doctors for Choice, Colombia).
Wear, S., Lagaipa, S., & Logue, G. (1994). Toleration of Moral Diversity and the Conscientious Refusal by Physicians to Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment. The Journal of Medicine & Philosophy, 19(2), 147-159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/19.2.147
Weinstock, D. (2014). Conscientious Refusal and Health Professionals: Does Religion Make a Difference? Bioethics, 28(1), 8-15. doi: https://doi.org/10/f5k6kk
West-Oram, P., & Buyx, A. (2016). Conscientious Objection in Healthcare Provision: A New Dimension. Bioethics, 30(5), 336-343. doi: https://doi.org/10/f8sxr3
Wicclair, M. R. (2011). Conscientious Objection in Health Care: An Ethical Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511973727
Zúñiga, Y. (2018). Los debates sobre el aborto. Paradojas, narrativas y dispositivos de poder-saber. Anales de La Cátedra Francisco Suárez, 52, 91-111.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Derecho PUCP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
