Pacific Alliance, CPTPP and USMCA investment chapters: Substantive convergence, procedural divergence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202101.005Keywords:
Pacific Alliance (PA), Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP, CPTPPA, TPP-11, TPP11, TPP, TPPA), United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Free trade agreement (FTA), International investment agreement, Investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS)Abstract
This article compares the investment chapters of the Additional Protocol to the Framework Agreement of the Pacific Alliance (PA-AP), the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). Our objective is to determine their degree of normative convergence. We conclude that these investment chapters include very similar substantive rules and principles on international investments in terms of definitions, the rules’ scope of application, treatment standards (national treatment and most favored nation treatment), absolute standards (international minimum standard of treatment, fair and equitable treatment, and full protection and security), investment protection rules (direct and indirect expropriation, compensation, and transfers), and performance requirements. We also conclude that these investment chapters differ, in some respects very strongly, regarding investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS). First, TPP and USMCA rules are often similar and frequently diverge from PA-AP rules. Second, party coverage and protection coverage diverge strongly between the USMCA vis-a-vis the PA-AP and CPTPP. Thus, as a consequence of substantive convergence and strong procedural divergence, we argue that complainants will most likely choose the forum between the PA-AP, CPTPP and USMCA according to procedural reasons.
Downloads
References
Alianza del Pacífico. (28 de abril de 2011). Declaración Presidencial sobre la Alianza del Pacífico (Declaración de Lima). https://alianzapacifico.net/download/declaracion-de-lima-abril-28-de-2011/
Alianza del Pacífico. (s.f.). Lineamientos aplicables a los Estados Asociados a la Alianza del Pacífico. https://alianzapacifico.net/wp-content/uploads/ANEXOLINEAMIENTOS-ESTADO-ASOCIADO-2.pdf
Alvarez, J. E. (2016). Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Investment Chapter the New “Gold Standard”? Victoria University of Wellington Law Review, 47(4), 503-544. https://doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v47i4.4789
Amarasinha, S., & Kokott, J. (2008). Multilateral Investment Rules Revisited. En P. Muchlinski, F. Ortino y C. Schreuer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (pp. 119-153). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199231386.013.0004
Chaisse, J. (2012). CPTPP Agreement: towards innovations in investment rulemaking. En C. L. Lim, D. K. Elmsy y P. Low (eds.), The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twenty-first Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139236775.015
Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo (Unctad). (2004). Glossary of key terms and concepts in IIAs. Ginebra.
Conferencia de las Naciones Unidas sobre Comercio y Desarrollo (Unctad). (2013). Reform of Investor-State Dispute Settlement: In Search of a Roadmap. IIA Issues Note, (2). http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/webdiaepcb2013d4_en.pdf
Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2012). Principles of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law:iic/9780199211753.001.1
Dumberry, P. (2002). The NAFTA investment dispute settlement mechanism and the admissibility of amicus curiae briefs by NGOs. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 4(1), 58-82.
Foro de Cooperación Económica Asia-Pacífico (APEC). (2011 [1994]). APEC Non-Binding Investment Principles (NBIP). https://www.apec.org/Achievements/Group/Committee-on-Trade-and-Investment-2/Investment-Experts-Group-2
Furculita, C. (2020). FTA Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: Alternative Fora for Trade Disputes—The Case of CETA and EUJEPA. En W. Weiß y C. Furculita (eds.), Global Politics and EU Trade Policy. European Yearbook of International Economic Law (pp. 89-111). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34588-4_5
Gallardo-Salazar, N., & Tijmes-Ihl, J. (2020). Dispute Settlement at the World Trade Organization, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the Pacific Alliance. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 11(4), 638-658. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idaa021
Gallardo-Salazar, N., & Tijmes-Ihl, J. (2021). The Pacific Alliance and the CPTPP as alternatives to WTO dispute settlement. Derecho PUCP, (86).
Gutiérrez Haces, M. (2015). Entre la observancia de los Acuerdos de Protección a la Inversión y el derecho a instrumentar políticas públicas de desarrollo en América Latina. En J. M. Álvarez Zárate (ed.), ¿Hacia dónde va América Latina respecto del Derecho internacional de las inversiones? (pp. 23-59). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Herreros, S., & García-Millán, T. (2017). Opciones para la convergencia entre la Alianza del Pacífico y el Mercado Común del Sur (MERCOSUR): la regulación de la inversión extranjera directa. Santiago de Chile: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.
Manciaux, S. (2008). The notion of investment: new controversies. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 6, 801-824. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34588-4_5
Nafta Free Trade Commission. (31 de julio de 2001). Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions. Organization of American States Foreign Trade Information System. http://www.sice.oas.org/tpd/nafta/Commission/CH11understanding_e.asp
Navarro, J. (2016). The Trans-Pacific Partnership And The Pacific Alliance: Complementary Agreements Toward Higher Regional Economic Integration in The Asia Pacific Region. Vancouver: Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada (ABAC).
Nottage, L. (2016). The TPP Investment Chapter and Investor-State Arbitration in Asia and Oceania: Assessing Prospects for Ratification. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 17(2), 1-36.
Novak, F., & Namihas, S. (2015). Alianza del Pacífico: situación, perspectivas y propuestas para su consolidación. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Internacionales de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
Polanco Lazo, R. (2015). El capítulo de inversión en el Acuerdo de Asociación Transpacífico: ¿una posibilidad de cambio y convergencia? En J. M. Álvarez Zárate (ed.), ¿Hacia dónde va América Latina respecto del Derecho internacional de las inversiones? (pp. 173-198). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Rodríguez Aranda, I. (2014). Nuevas configuraciones económicas en el Asia-Pacífico y sus consecuencias para América Latina: desde el APEC a la Alianza del Pacífico. Dados-Revista de Ciências Sociais, 57(2), 553-580. https://doi.org/10.1590/0011-5258201416
Schill, S. (2015). Reforming Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS): Conceptual Framework and Options for the Way Forward. Ginebra: E15Initiative.
Schill, S. (2016). International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law in a Latin American Perspective / Derecho internacional de inversiones y derecho público comparado en una perspectiva latino-americana. En A. Tanzi, A. Asteriti, R. Polanco y P. Turrini (eds.), International Investment Law in Latin America/ Derecho Internacional de las Inversiones en América Latina. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004311473_003
Schreuer, C. (2010). Full protection and security. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 1(2), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq002
Toro-Fernandez, J.-F. (2018). Normative Convergence Between the Pacific Alliance and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Transpacific Partnership as a Way of Attracting Investments and Promoting Services Chaining with Asia-Pacific [tesis de LLM, Universität Heidelberg - Universidad de Chile]. Santiago de Chile: Heidelberg Center Latin America.
Toro-Fernandez, J.-F., & Tijmes-Ihl, J. (2020a). Service chaining model between the Pacific Alliance and the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. Mundo Asia Pacífico, 9(17), 5-21. https://doi. org/10.17230/map.v9.i17.01
Toro-Fernandez, J.-F., & Tijmes-Ihl, J. (2020b). The Pacific Alliance and the Belt and Road Initiative. Asian Education and Development Studies [preprensa]. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-08-2019-0126
Toro-Fernandez, J.-F., & Tijmes-Ihl, J. (s.f.). La Alianza del Pacífico y el Tratado Integral y Progresista de Asociación Transpacífico (CPTPP) [en prensa]. Van den Berg, A. (2019). Appeal Mechanism for ISDS Awards: Interaction with the New York and ICSID Conventions. ICSID Review, 34(1), 156-189. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siz016
Zegarra Rodríguez, J. A. (2015). Los capítulos de inversión en los TLC y los TBI en Sudamérica, relaciones de conflicto o nuevos paradigmas. En J. M. Álvarez Zárate (ed.), ¿Hacia dónde va América Latina respecto del Derecho internacional de las inversiones? (pp. 199-218). Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia
Jurisprudencia, normativa y otros documentos legales
Acuerdo Amplio y Progresista de Asociación Transpacífico (CPTPP) (Sistema de Información sobre Comercio Exterior de la OEA, s.f.). http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/TPP/TPP_s.ASP
Acuerdo Marco de la Alianza del Pacífico (Sistema de Información sobre Comercio Exterior de la OEA, s.f.). http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/PAC_ALL/Framework_Agreement_Pacific_Alliance_s.pdf
Acuerdo de Asociación Transpacífico (TPP) (Sistema de Información sobre Comercio Exterior de la OEA, s.f.). http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/TPP/Final_Texts/Spanish/TPP_Index_s.asp
Marvin Roy Feldman Karpa vs. United Mexican States. Laudo, caso número ARB(AF)/99/1 (Icsid, 16 de diciembre de 2002).
Methanex vs. United States of America. Laudo final (Uncitral (Nafta), 3 de agosto de 2005).
Protocolo Adicional al Acuerdo Marco de la Alianza del Pacífico (Sistema de Información sobre Comercio Exterior de la OEA, s.f.). http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/PAC_ALL/Index_Pacific_Alliance_s.asp
Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. vs. Kingdom of Morocco. Decisión de Jurisdicción, caso número ARB/00/4 (Icsid, 23 de julio de 2001).
Tratado entre México, Estados Unidos y Canadá (T-MEC) (Sistema de Información sobre Comercio Exterior de la OEA, s.f.). http://www.sice.oas.org/Trade/USMCA/USMCA_ToC_PDF_s.asp
