Legislation as a Source of Law in Peru

Authors

  • Marcial Rubio Correa Pontifical Catholic University of Peru image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.198001.001

Keywords:

legislation, legislative system, theory of the State, theory of law, hierarchy of norms, Constitution, sources of law

Abstract

This article provides a detailed analysis of the legislative structure in Peru, highlighting its concepts, principles, and interrelations. To this end, the author organizes the topic into three theoretical elements: 1) the formal sources of law, 2) the peculiarities of sources of law in Comparative Law, and 3) the functions of the State, the theory of the separation of powers and its consequences. In this line, the author first defines the formal source of law as a procedure that produces binding legal norms and addresses legislation as one of them, emphasizing its role in creating general norms. Secondly, the article emphasizes the modernity of legislation as the most important formal source of law, due to the hegemony of the State and its legal development. In this context, the author discusses the evolution of the Peruvian Constitution, which has transitioned from an initially liberal conception to include a wide range of norms on social benefits of the State, economic, financial, and fiscal regimes, and political and union organization. Finally, he addresses the complexity of dealing comprehensively with legislative norms, due to their nature and the various functions of the Executive Branch. In this regard, the article highlights the variety and lack of specific formality of the norms issued by this branch. Based on this, the author concludes by emphasizing the complexity and inorganic nature of Peruvian executive legislation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Marcial Rubio Correa, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru
    Profesor del Departamento de Derecho de la PUCP

References

Alayza y Paz Soldán, Toribio (1927). Derecho administrativo general y del Perú. Lima: Sanmartí y Cía.

Álvarez Simonetti, Manuel (1974). Debate en torno a la acción popular. Derecho PUCP, 32, pp. 73-88.

Belaúnde López de Romaña, Javier de (1974). Algunas consideraciones en torno a los gobiernos de facto y las vigencias constitucionales. Derecho PUCP, 32, pp. 93-124.

Bodenheimer, Edgar (1964). Teoría del derecho. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Bossuet, Jacques Bénigne (1974). Política sacada de las sagradas escrituras. Madrid: Tecnos.

Bustamante Belaúnde, Alberto (1979). El gobierno y la administración en la Constitución. Apuntes: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 9, pp. 43-52.

Constant, Benjamín (1970). Principios de política. Madrid: Editorial Aguilar.

Duverger, Maurice (1970). Instituciones políticas y derecho constitucional. Barcelona: Ariel.

Furnish, Dale Beck (1972). La jerarquía del ordenamiento jurídico peruano. Derecho PUCP, 30, pp. 61-80.

García Belaúnde, Domingo (1971). El habeas corpus interpretado: 1933-1970. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Kelsen, Hans (1965). Teoría pura del derecho. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.

Pease, Henry, Marcial Rubio Correa y Laura Madalengoitia (1978). Mitos de la democracia. Lima: DESCO.

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1966). El contrato social. Madrid: Taurus Ediciones.

Rubio Correa, Marcial (1978). La actuación del Poder Ejecutivo y la estructura del orden jurídico. Apuntes: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 8, pp. 81-98.

Sánchez Viamonte, Carlos (1957). El poder constituyente. Buenos Aries: Editorial Bibliográfica Argentina.

Sieyes, Emmanuel-Joseph (1973). ¿Qué es el Tercer Estado? Madrid: Aguilar S.A.

Downloads

Published

1980-06-01

Issue

Section

Main Section

How to Cite