The convergence between competition law and intellectual property rights

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201501.010

Keywords:

competition, intellectual property, patents, compulsory licensing, abuse of dominant position, cost benefit

Abstract

Indecopi has within its functions the defense of free competition and the protection of intellectual property. This institutional design has the advantage of being able to see more clearly what are the points of convergence between the two subject-matter, harmonize them and achieve the goals they have in common. Within this convergence, there are sensitive issues as the granting of compulsory licenses. In this work, we highlight that compulsory licenses are exceptional measures and, to consider its granting, the State must have a procedure that provides confidence and predictability to citizens and clear definitions of what is meant by public interest, emergency and national security. Finally, it is proposed that the granting of compulsory licenses should be justified by a cost benefit analysis showing that is the best choice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Hebert Eduardo Tassano Velaochaga, INDECOPI


    Presidente del Consejo Directivo del indeCopi (Perú). Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católicadel Perú (PUCP). Máster en Regulación de Servicios Públicos por la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (Perú) y el IEDE Business School (España), Universidad Europea de Madrid (España). Profesor en la PUCP, ESAN, Universidad del Pacífico y Universidad San Martín de Porres.Correo electrónico: htassano@indecopi.gob.pe

References

Cabanellas, Guillermo (2006). Propiedad intelectual y libre competencia. Buenos Aires.(http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/lac/es/ompi_jpi_bue_06/ompi_jpi_bue_06_8.pdf).

Carrier, Michael A (2012). Competition Law and Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Industry. En: Ariel Ezraki (ed.). Research Handbook on International Competition Law. Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing.

Cooter, Robert y Thomas Ulen (1998). Derecho y economía. México D.F.: FCE.

Ezrachi, Ariel & Mariateresa Maggiolino (2012). European Competition Law, Compulsory Licensing and Innovation. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 8, 3, pp. 595-614.

Resolución 045-2009/CLC-INDECOPI.

Resolución 062-CCO-2000/Osiptel.

Sola, Juan Vicente (2004). Constitución y economía. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.

U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission (1995). The Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. (http://www.ftc.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/competition-policy-guidance/0558.pdf).

Downloads

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

The convergence between competition law and intellectual property rights. (2015). Derecho PUCP, 74, 237-248. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201501.010