The other dimension of law

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201602.004

Keywords:

law and psychoanalysis, Interdiction, the Third, atomic bond of law, Roman Canon law

Abstract

In times at which economic logic and a one-dimensional discourse of science silence alternative ways of thinking in our societies, this paper invites us to understand the law from a largely unexplored dimension: the dimension that institutes life, binding the social, the biological and the unconscious in a space that reproduces the logic of Interdiction. To achieve this goal, this paper begins by exploring the obstacles that make jurists unable to conceive a link between their discipline and psychoanalysis, as well as incapable of opening the law to its analysis. Among these, we encounter conceiving the legal system as the discourse of Reason in the West, construction which will remain an obstacle to the convergence between law and psychoanalysis unless we understand that the origin of this conception lies in the choice of Roman Canon law as its historical representation. Then, it reviews the notion of society, approaching it as a theatrical construction set by discursive practices, allowing the recovery of genealogical knowledge of the reference and to this end, builds on the knowledge of Roman law. Hand-in-hand with a psychoanalytic approach, it points out how a vast social system of interpretations places the law within the transmission of the Interdiction for the subject, transmission which introduces him to the institutional dimension of the limit. We also approach the unconscious aspects of the representation of the subject, by putting a transsexualism case law under the light of its notion of symbolic determinism. Finally, it reflects on the power of the State to divide words and things, that is, the Third separator, category necessary for the operation of law. Consequently, this paper allows law to be seen as refering to the order of life and also calls upon psychoanalysis to deepen the institutional dimension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Pierre Legendre, University of Paris I

    Legal historian and psychoanalyst. Professor of Law, University of Paris I (Pantheon-Sorbonne), Ecole des Hautes Etudes de Sciences Sociales, Section des Sciences Religieuses. Director of the European Laboratory for the Study of Filiation.

References

Aristóteles (1984). Politics. En The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, edición de Jonathan Barnes, volumen 2 (pp. 1986-2129). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

de Luca, Giovanni Battista (1706). Theatrum veritatis et Iustitiae. Colonia: Apud Henricum Rommerskirchen.

Demóstenes (1985). Discursos políticos. Volumen III. Madrid: Gredos.

Goodrich, Peter (1997). An abbreviated glossary. En Peter Goodrich (ed.), Law and the unconscious: a Legendre reader (pp. 257-262). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25974-8.

Justiniano (1985). Digest. En The Digest of Justinian. Edición de Theodor Mommseny Paul Krueger, traducción editada por Alan Watson, cuatro volúmenes. Filadelfia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Legendre, Pierre (1981). Les juifs se livrent a des interpretations insensees. Expertise d’un texte. En Adelie Rassial y Jean-Jacques Rassial (eds.), La psychanalyse est-elleune histoire juive? (pp. 93-113). París: Editions du Seuil. Existe una traducción al alemán por Anton Schutz de 1989: Die Juden interpretieren Verruckt. Gutachten zu einem klassischen Text. Psyche, 43(1), 20-39.

Legendre, Pierre (1989). Leçons VIII. Le Crime du caporal Lortie. Traité sur le Père. París: Fayard.

Legendre, Pierre (1992). Leçons VI. Les enfants du Texte. Étude sur la fonction parentale des États. París: Fayard.

Legendre, Pierre (1994). Lecciones VIII: El Crimen del Cabo Lortie. Tratado sobre el Padre. México D.F.: Siglo XXI.

Legendre, Pierre (1995). The other dimension of law. Cardozo Law Review, 16(3-4), 943-961.

Legendre, Pierre (1996a). Lecciones IV: El inestimable objeto de la transmisión. México D.F.: Siglo XXI.

Legendre, Pierre (1996b). Anthropologie dogmatique. Définition d’un concept. En Annuaire, 109(105), 23-43.

Legendre, Pierre (1997a). Introduction to the theory of the image: Narcissus and the Other in the mirror. En Peter Goodrich (ed.), Law and the unconscious: a Legendre reader (pp. 211-254). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25974-8_10.

Legendre, Pierre (1997b). Hermes and institutional structures: an essay on dogmatic communication. En Peter Goodrich (ed.), Law and the unconscious: a Legendre reader (pp. 137-163). Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25974-8_8.

Legendre, Pierre (1999). Sur la question dogmatique en Occident. París: Fayard.Legendre, Pierre (2008a). La fábrica del hombre occidental. Seguido de El hombre homicida. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Legendre, Pierre (2008b). El tajo. Discurso a jóvenes estudiantes sobre la ciencia y la ignorancia. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Legendre, Pierre (ed.) (1998). Du pouvoir de diviser les mots et les choses. Travaux du laboratoire européen pour l’étude de la filiation N° 2. Bruselas: Émile Van Balberghe Libraire-Yves Gevaert Éditeur.

Normativa y Jurisprudencia

Corte Europea de Derechos Humanos (1992). B. v. Francia. Sentencia de 25 de marzo de1992, Serie A, 232-C.

Tribunal de la Jeunesse (1988). Sentencia de 31 de marzo de 1988. Droit de la Famille -480, [1988]. Recueils de jurisprudence du Québec [R.J.Q.].

Downloads

Published

2016-11-14

Issue

Section

Main Section