Vulnerabilidad entre derechos humanos y bioética. Relaciones tormentosas, conflictos insolutos

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201202.001

Keywords:

bioethics, human rights, vulnerability

Abstract

Vulnerability, human rights, and bioethics. Turbulent
relationships, unsolved conflicts.

Vulnerability as potential harm has been confused with actual damage, leading to the improper conclusion that those already harmed, therefore wrongly called vulnerable, are considered unable to take care of their own interests. Fragile, but as yet unharmed, vulnerability is an anthropological trait that implies liberty and equality as proclaimed by human rights, as well as by the ethics fundamental to all human endeavors. The universality of human rights has been put to question, arguing that they can only be claimed by individuals who are recognized as citizens. Also, different cultures and specific social groups demand the recognition of rights that are respectful of their singularity, and therefore not universal.
The fundamental rights to liberty need to be complemented by political and social rights that take care of actual needs, harms and disempowerment. This kind of language is proper to bioethics, a  discipline focused upon human interventions on vital processes, deliberating upon sensitive issues that require decisions as well as normative public policies of social practices that pertain to its realm of reflection.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Miguel Kottow, University of Chile

    Médico, profesor titular de la Universidad de Chile, académico de la Escuela de Salud Pública, de la Facultad de Medicina de Santiago de Chile

References

Arras J.D. & E.M. Fenton (2009). «Bioethics & Human Rights: Access to Health-Related Goods». The Hastings Center Report, 39, 5 , p. 35.

Balibar, Étienne (2004). «Is Philosophy of Human Civic Rights Possible? New Reflections on Equaliberty». South Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 2-3 , p. 312.

Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (2002). Pautas éticas internacionales para la investigación biomédica en seres humanos. Ginebra: CIOMS/OPS/OMS, p. 69.

Esposito, Roberto (2011). El dispositivo de la persona. Buenos Aires/Madrid: Amorrortu Editores, p. 69.

Fayos Febrer, Rafael (2005). «Vulnerabilidad e indigencia de la condición humana». En Cayuela, Aquilino (ed.). Vulnerables: Pensar la fragilidad humana. Madrid: Ediciones Encuentro, pp. 10-30, pp. 16-17.

Honneth, Axel (1997). «Recognition and Moral Obligation». Social Research, 64, 1, p. 28.

Honneth, Axel (2009). Crítica del agravio moral. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina.

Ignatieff, Michael. Brown, Wendy. «“The Most We Can Hope For...”. Human Rights and the Politics of Fatalism». Southern Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 2-3 (2004), p. 452.

Joffe, Steven & Franklin Miller (2008). «Bench to Bedside: Mapping the Moral Terrain of Clinical Research». The Hastings Center Report, 38, 2 , p. 40.

Kipnis, Kenneth (2003). «Seven Vulnerabilities in the Pediatric Research Subject». Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 24, 2, pp. 107-120..

Kottow, Miguel (2004). «Vulnerability: What Kind of Principle Is It?». Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, VII, 3, pp. 281-287.

Kottow, Miguel (2007). Ética de protección. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.

Kottow, Miguel (2012). Bioética relacional. Saarbrücken: Editorial Académica Española.

Landman, Willem & Udo Schüklenk (2005). «Unesco “Declares” Universals on Bioethics and Human Rights. Many Unexpected Universal Truths Unearthed by UN Body». Developing World Bioethics, 5, 3 , p. vi.

Luna, Florencia (2011). «Vulnerabilidad: un concepto muy útil. Abandonando los “corsets teóricos”». Revista Redbioética/UNESCO, 2, 1 , pp. 85-90, p. 86.

Maritain, Jacques. Natural Law (2001). Reflections on Theory and Practice. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, p. 58.

Miller, Franklin & Howard Brody (2003). «A Critique of Clinical Equipoise. Therapeutic Misconception in the Ethics of Clinical Trials». The Hastings Center Report, 33, 3 , pp. 19-28, p. 25.

Morales Gildela Torre, Héctor. «Introducción: notas sobre la transición en México y los derechos humanos». En morales gildela torre, Héctor (coord.). Derechos humanos: dignidad y conflicto. México D.F.: Universidad Interamericana, 1996, p. 19.

Noddings, Nel (2002). «Caring, Social Policy, and Homelessness». Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 23, 6 , pp. 441-454.

O’Neill, Onora (1998). Towards Justice and Virtue. A Constructive Account of Practical Reasonin. Cambridge/Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.

O’Neill, Onora (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 30.

Park, Stephanie & Mitchell Grayson (2008). «Clinical Research: Protection of the “Vulnerable”?». The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 121, 5 , p. 1103.

Pascal, Blais (1986). Pensamientos. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, fragmento 152. Los «Pensées» de Pascal se presentan como fragmentos que han sido diversamente ordenados. La numeración aquí presentada es de Louis Lafuma, traductor y considerado el más acucioso recopilador de la obra de Pascal.

Pellegrino, Edmund & David Thomasma (1981). A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice. Nueva York/Oxford: Oxford Univeristy Press, p. 73.

Pfeiffer, María Luisa (2006). «Ética y derechos humanos. Hacia una fundamentación de la bioética». Revista Brasileira de Bioética, 2 , p. 297.

Rancière, Jacques (2004). «Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man?». South Atlantic Quarterly, 103, 2-3 , p. 302.

Rancière, Jacques (2007). En los bordes de los políticos. Buenos Aires: Ediciones La Cebra.

Rendtorff, Jacob Dahl & Peter Kemp (2000). Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw(volúmenes 1-2). Copenhague/Barcelona: Centre for Ethics and Law, Copenhagen/Institut Borja de Bioética, Barcelona, p. 46.

Rhodes, Rosamond (2005). «Rethinking Research Ethics». American Journal of Bioethics, V, 1 , p. 7-28.

Sen, Amartya (1995). Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, p. 149.

Sen, Amartya (2000). Development as Freedom. Nueva York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Singer, Peter (1979). Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tealdi, Juan Carlos (2008). «Bioética de los Derechos Humanos». En tealdi, Juan Carlos (ed.). Diccionario latinoamericano de bioética. Bogotá: Unesco/Universidad Nacional de Bioética, p. 180.

Weil, Simone (1986). An Anthology. Nueva York: Grove Press, p. 54.

ŽiŽeK, Slavoj (2005). «Against Human Rights». New Left Review, 34 , p. 130.

Downloads

Published

2012-11-15

How to Cite

Vulnerabilidad entre derechos humanos y bioética. Relaciones tormentosas, conflictos insolutos. (2012). Derecho PUCP, 69, 25-44. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201202.001