Responsabilidad social en la investigación con humanos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201202.011Keywords:
ethics, bioethics, social responsibility, right to health, research with human beingsAbstract
Social responsibility in research with human beings
It seems anachronistic to keep on talking of ethics and bioethics in a globalized culture. All ethics is based on a responsibility that acknowledges the value of the other because it forces an answer and this answer is supposed to be free. The exercise of freedom improves, grows, increases when limits are part of it. The possibilities of the answer are constructed by exchange when the limits act upon the behavior of the individual. In bioethics there is a strong tendency to associate responsibility with acts of individual relation. This neglects the strictly solidary character of responsibility. Freedom is conditioned by equality but much more by solidarity. Solidarity forces us to accept limits imposed to us by coexistence. Health is the space where this becomes relevant. Therefore it is necessary to think of social responsibility from a bioethics perspective based on human rights, especially on the right to health. This work does precisely that, focusing on research with human beings.
Downloads
References
Aranguren, Pedro (1958). Ética. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Asociación médica mundial (2001). Declaración de Helsinski Artículo 15.Disponible en Anales de la Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, 62, 1 , (http://sisbib.unmsm.edu.pe/bvrevistas/anales/v62_n1/etica_helsinki.htm).
Eulabor (2010). Documento Final del Proyecto de Investigación «Sistemas de regulación ética de la investigación biomédica en Latinoamérica y Europa». (http://www.eulabor.org/docs/propwp5_esp.pdf)
Googins, Bradley (2007). Beyond Good Company: Next Generation Corporate Citizenship. Ontario: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jonas, Hans (1987). Wissenschaft als persönliches Erlebnis. Gotinga: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Kottow, Miguel (2005). «Conflictos en ética de investigación con seres humanos». Cadernos de Saúde Pública. XXI, 3 , pp. 862-869, p. 868.
Lenoir, Frédéric (dir.) (1991). Le temps de la responsabilité. Entretiens sur l’éthique avec Jean Bernard, Marie-Colette Boisset, Jacques Delors et al. Postface de Paul Ricoeur, París: Fayard, p. 218.
Levinas, Emanuel (1993). Humanismo del otro hombre. Córdoba: Siglo Veintiuno Editores.
Macklin, Ruth (2004). «Ética de la investigación internacional: el problema de la justicia hacia los países menos desarrollados». Acta bioética, X, 1 , pp. 27-35.
Ministerio de salud de la República Argentina (2011). Guía para Investigaciones con Seres Humanos. Resolución 1480/2011, (http://www.anmat.gov.ar/webanmat/legislacion/medicamentos/Resolucion_1480-2011.pdf).
Pfeiffer, María Luisa (ed.) (2004). Bioética. ¿Estrategia de dominación para América Latina?Mar del Plata: Suárez.
Redbioética/ Unesco (2004). Carta de Buenos Aires, (http://www.unesco.org.uy/ci/fileadmin/shs/redbioetica/CartaBuenosAires-RED.pdf).
UNESCO (2005). Declaración Universal de Bioética y Derechos Humanos. En Documentos. Red latinoamericana y del caribe de bioética (http://www.unesco.org.uy/shs/red-bioetica/es/biblioteca/documentos.html).
Zubiri, Xavier (1943). Naturaleza, Historia, Dios. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1994; sartre, Jean-Paul. L’ être et le néant. París: Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.