Law on the analyst’s couch?: the uses of psychoanalytic theory in contemporary U.S. scholarship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201602.003Keywords:
Freud, psychoanalytic jurisprudence, critical legal studies, LacanAbstract
In the U.S. legal context, psychoanalysis is viewed by most scholars (and most judges) as outdated, even unscientific, and there is little room for psychoanalytic expertise in U.S. courts of law. However, there are some scholars who continue to do theoretical work in the conventional Freudian tradition, as well as numerous critical legal theorists who have appropriated the psychoanalytic conceptions of Jacques Lacan in their critiques of the law. This is a brief survey of how these scholars conceive of the law in psychoanalytic terms. Is it the judge being analyzed? Is it the lawyers, or the law students? Is the law itself viewed as subject with an unconscious and with symptoms? Or is it an analysis of legal texts as having an unconscious dimension that is hidden like an ideology? I identify examples of all four frameworks, and conclude that these scholars, notwithstanding their theoretical orientation, have practical goals for law in mind.
Downloads
References
Adler, Amy (2007). Symptomatic Cases: Hysteria in the Supreme Court’s Nude Dancing Decisions. American Imago, 64(3), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2007.0031.
Bienenfeld, Franz Rudolf (1965a). Prolegomena to a psychoanalysis of law and justice. California Law Review, 53(4), 957-1028. https://doi.org/10.2307/3478985.
Bienenfeld, Franz Rudolf (1965b). Prolegomena to a psychoanalysis of law and justice: Part II. Analysis. California Law Review, 53(5), 1254-1336. https://doi.org/10.2307/3478954.
Butts, Hugh F. (1999). Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Racial Profiling. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27(4), 633-635.
Caudill, David S. (1997). Lacan and the Subject of Law: Toward a Psychoanalytic Critical Legal Theory. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Caudill, David S. (1999). The Anatomy in Property Law: «It’s not about sex,» or is it? Cardozo Law Review, 20(6), 1695-1704.
Caudill, David S. (2016). An Assessment of the Existence and Influence of Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence in the United States. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 48(5), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.06.003.
Caudill, David S. & Lewis H. LaRue (2006). No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in Law. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Douzinas, Costas (1996). Psychoanalysis Becomes the Law: Notes on an Encounter Foretold. The Legal Studies Forum, 20(3), 323-336.
Douzinas, Costas (1998) Law and the Emotions: Prolegomena for a Psychoanalytic Approach to Legal Study. European University Institute (Florence) Working Paper(Law), número 98/8.
Duncan, Martha Grace (1999). Romantic Outlaws, Beloved Prisons: The Unconscious Meanings of Crime and Punishment. Nueva York: New York Univeristy Press.
Ehrenzweig, Albert (1971). Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence: On Ethics, Aesthetics, and Law —On Crime, Tort, and Procedure. Leiden: Sijthoff.
Frank, Jerome (1930). Law and the Modern Mind. Nueva York: Tudor.
Goldstein, Joseph (1968). Psychoanalysis and Jurisprudence. The Yale Law Journal, 77(6), 1053-1077. https://doi.org/10.2307/794884.
Goodrich, Peter (1995). Oedipus Lex: Psychoanalysis, History, Law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Goodrich, Peter (1996a). «The Unconscious is a Jurist»: Psychoanalysis and Law in the Work of Pierre Legendre. The Legal Studies Forum, 20(3), 195-228.
Goodrich, Peter (1996b). Law in the Courts of Love: Literature and Other Minor Jurisprudences. Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413326.
Goodrich, Peter (1997). Maladies of the Legal Soul: Psychoanalysis and Interpretation in Law. Washington & Lee Law Review, 54(3), 1035-1074.
Lee, Jonathan Scott (1990). Jacques Lacan. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Legendre, Pierre (1996). Id Efficit, Quod Figurat (It is the symbol which produces effects): The social constitution of speech and the development of the normative role of images. The Legal Studies Forum, 20, 247–263.
Milovanovic, Dragan (1992). Postmodern Law and Disorder: Psychoanalytic Semiotics, Chaos and Juridic Exegeses. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publishers.
Morrison, Steven R. (2006). Dehumanization and Re-creation: A Lacanian Interpretation of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Dartmouth Law Journal, 4(3), 81-126.
Oliner, Marion M. (1988). Cultivating Freud’s Garden in France. Northvale: Jason Aronson.
Ragland-Sullivan, Ellie (1987). Jacques Lacan and the Philosophy of Psychoanalysis. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schmeiser, Susan (2007). Punishing Guilt. American Imago, 64(3), 317-337. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2007.0034.
Schoenfeld, Charles George (1973). Psychoanalysis and the Law. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Schroeder, Jeanne Lorraine (1997). The Vestal and the Fasces: Psychoanalytical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Feminine and Property. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schroeder, Jeanne Lorraine (2000). The Hysterical Attorney: The Legal Advocate within Lacanian Discourse Theory. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 13(2), 181–213. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008936328366.
Schroeder, Jeanne Lorraine (2004). The Triumph of Venus: The Erotics of the Market. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schroeder, Jeanne Lorraine (2008). The Four Lacanian Discourses, Or Turning Law Inside-Out. Nueva York: Routledge-Cavendish. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203893654.
Stolzenberg, Nomi Maya (2007). Anti-Anxiety Law: Winnicott and the Legal Fiction of Paternity. American Imago, 64(3), 339-379. https://doi.org/10.1353/aim.2007.0036.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
