The reasons for the award: the comparative standard on the duty to provide reasons in arbitration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202601.019Keywords:
Arbitral Awards, Reasoning of Awards, Comparative Regulation, Arbitration Centers, Standard of ReasoningAbstract
The article examines international practice regarding the reasoning of arbitral awards. First, it sets out the purpose of reasoning. Then, it reviews legislation and case law in various countries concerning arbitral practice. It also presents the treatment in major arbitration centers. Finally, it discusses the requirement of reasoning, identifying the justifications for it, the expected standard in practice, and the minimum elements that arbitral awards must contain. The conclusion is that reasoning is an indispensable requirement for the quality, effectiveness, and legitimacy of arbitration.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2026-08-31
Issue
Section
Main Section
How to Cite
Reggiardo Saavedra, M., & Palacios Zárate, A. (2026). The reasons for the award: the comparative standard on the duty to provide reasons in arbitration. IUS ET VERITAS, (72), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202601.019


.png)
.png)