Maximum Mortgages in the Peruvian System of Guarantees. What happens to the Principles of Accessoriety and Specialty of Credit in the Maximum Mortgages?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201802.004

Keywords:

Mortgage, Credit, Tax, Accessoriety, Property Guarantee

Abstract

In this article, the authors analyze, from doctrine and jurisprudence, both national and international, the treatment of maximum mortgages, their meaning, main characters, problems surrounding their application, and various aspects of the economic role they play in legal traffic. Maximum mortgage supposes that the parties establish, at the moment of their constitution, a maximum amount of mortgage liability, which given their flexibility has allowed new financial and credit products. This has generated a questioning of the existence of the principles of accessoriety and specialty, because when it is established, there is no specific credit.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Enrique Varsi Rospigliosi, University of Lima

    Doctor y Magister en Derecho. Docente investigador en la Universidad de Lima. Investigador Regina del Consejo Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Tecnológica - CONCYTEC, orcid.org/0000-0002-7206-6555. Socio del Estudio Rodríguez Angobaldo Abogados.

  • Marco Andrei Torres Maldonado, National University of San Marcos

    Abogado por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Jefe de prácticas es investigador adjunto de la Universidad de Lima. orcid.org/0000-0001-9943-3890. Asociado del Estudio Rodríguez Angobaldo Abogados.

Downloads

Published

2019-04-15

Issue

Section

Main Section

How to Cite

Maximum Mortgages in the Peruvian System of Guarantees. What happens to the Principles of Accessoriety and Specialty of Credit in the Maximum Mortgages? (2019). IUS ET VERITAS, 57, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201802.004