No pain, no gain: nine proposals to improve the future of international arbitration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.006

Keywords:

International arbitration, arbitration award, procedure

Abstract

The figure of international arbitration is briefly defined as a method of conflict resolution in the international level, alternative to the Administration of Justice, emphasizing its neutrality, speed and confidentiality.
This article shows the new challenges faced by arbitrators, in terms of choice, length of process and efficiency in decision making. In addition, it proposes nine solutions to improve arbitration performance and abbreviate the process of taking decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • José María de la Jara, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru

    Abogado. Profesor de Análisis Psicológico del Derecho en la Universidad del Pacífico. Profesor Adjunto del curso de Seminario de Integración en Estrategia Procesal y Litigación Oral en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

  • Julio Olórtegui, Peruvian University of Applied Sciences
    Abogado. Asociado del estudio Bullard, Falla y Ezcurra. Internat Dechert LLP (Paris) – International Arbitration Department.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-24

Issue

No. 71 (2017): Derecho procesal y arbitraje

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

No pain, no gain: nine proposals to improve the future of international arbitration. (2017). THEMIS Revista de Derecho, 71, 91-107. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.006