¿La región como trampolín para la emergencia global? Las estrategias regionales de Brasil y Turquía
Resumen
Tomando en consideración el carácter transitorio del actual sistema internacional, el presente artículo pretende analizar la relación entre la emergencia global de diversas potencias del Sur y su proyección regional. Luego de una exploración de la literatura académica sobre las potencias regionales, medias y emergentes, se realiza una comparación entre las estrategias regionales de dos Estados, Brasil y Turquía, basada en cuatro dimensiones: sus recursos (relativos) de poder, la autopercepción respecto a la región, las estrategias y roles propios de su política regional y la recepción de dicha proyección por los vecinos y las principales potencias extrarregionales. A partir de esta comparación, se determina de qué manera estas estrategias regionales se relacionan con la aspiración de emergencia global de ambas potencias.
Referencias bibliográficas
Abou-El-Fadl, R. (2012). Arab perceptions of Contemporary Turkish Foreign Policy: Cautious Engagement and the Question of Independence. En K. Öktem, A. Kadıoĝlu y M. Karli. Another Empire? A decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party (pp. 231-257). Estambul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
Acharya, A. (2018). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity.
Akgün, M., Perçinoğlu, G. y Senyücel, S. (2009). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East. Estambul: Tesev Publications.
Akgün, M. y Senyücel, S. (2012). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2012. Estambul: Tesev Publications.
Akgün, M. y Senyücel, S. (2013). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2013. Estambul: Tesev Foreign Policy Programme.
Almeida, P. (2010). Never before Seen in Brazil: Luís Inácio da Silva ́s grand diplomacy. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000200009
Altunışık, M. (2014). Geopolitical representation of Turkey’s cuspness. Discourse and practice. En M. Herzog y P. Robins, The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations (pp. 25-41). Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768472-2
Amorim, C. (2010). Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003-2010): An over-view. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53, 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300013
Aporrea (17 de diciembre de 2008). Presidente Chávez: «El liderazgo de Brasil es importante, pero no el único». Recuperado de https://www.aporrea.org/actualidad/n125702.html
Burges, S. (2009). Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813033334.001.0001
Buzan, B. y Wæver, O. (2004). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cagaptay, S. (16 de agosto de 2013). The Muslim Brotherhood’s Fall Lands Turkey an Unexpected Ally: Kurds. The Atlantic. Recuperado de https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/the-muslim-brotherhoods-fall-lands-turkey-an-unexpected-ally-kurds
Comisión Europea (2007). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Towards an EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership. (COM/2007/0281). Recuperado de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52007DC0281
Committee on Armed Services. United States Senate. (2011). The current and future world-wide threats to the National Security of the United States. Senate Hearing 112-159. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Recuperado de https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112shrg71354/html/CHRG-112shrg71354.htm
Cooper, D. (2011). Challenging Contemporary Notions of Middle Power Influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative for ‘Middle Power Theory’. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7, 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00140.x
Cooper, D. (2013). Somewhere between Great and Small: Disentangling the Conceptual Jumble of Middle, Regional, and ‘Niche’ Powers. The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14(2), 23-35. Recuperado de https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1014484.pdf
Corporación Latinobarómetro (2012). Informe 2011. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.
Couto, L. (2007). O horizonte regional do Brasil e a construção da América do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 50, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292007000100009
Cox, R. y Sinclair, T. (1996). Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607905
Davutoğlu, A. (Noviembre de 2011). Vision 2023: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Objectives. En Goldman Sachs, Turkey Investor Conference: The road to 2023. Londres, Reino Unido. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/speech-entitled-_vision-2023_-turkey_s-foreign-policy-objectives__-delivered-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-af.en.mfa
Davutoglu, A. (2013). Turkey’s Mediation: critical reflections from the field. Middle East Policy, 20(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12005
Del Arenal, C. (1983). Poder y relaciones internacionales: un análisis conceptual. Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 4(3), 501-524.
Destradi, S. (2010). Regional powers and their strategies: empire, hegemony and lead-ership. Review of International Studies, 36, 903-930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001361
Devinit (2017). Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2017. Bristol: Development Initiatives. Recuperado de http://devinit.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GHA-Report-2017-Full-report.pdf
Dewitt, D. y Christie, R. (2007). Los poderes medios y la seguridad regional. En J. Tokatlian (Comp.), India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales(pp. 55-95). Buenos Aires: Zorzal.
Eksi, M. (2016). The Rise and Fall of Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy during JDP. Saarbrücken: LambertAcademic Publishing.
ESI (4 de diciembre de 2010). Is Turkey’s Balkan policy today inspired by a post-modern vision of the world? A pre-modern one? And does it matter how we call it? Recuperado de http://www.esiweb.org/rumeliobserver/2010/12/04/multikulti-and-the-future-of-turkish-balkan-policy
Fisher, N. (2012). ’Democratic Depth’: The Missing Ingredient in Turkey’s Domestic/Foreign Policy Nexus. K. Öktem, A. Kadıoĝlu y M. Karli, Another Empire? A decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party (pp. 61-75). Estambul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
Flemes, D. (2007). Conceptualizing Regional Power in International Relations – Lessons from the South African Case. Giga Working Paper, 53. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000123
Flemes, D. y Wojczewski, T. (2011). Contested Leadership in Comparative Perspective: Power Strategies in South Asia and South America. Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 24(1), 1-27.
Föhrig, A. (2007). Resistencias y equilibrios regionales. En J. Tokatlian (Comp.), India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El Impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales. Buenos Aires: Zorzal.
Fonseca, P., Paes, L. y Cunha, A. (2016). The concept of emerging power in international politics and economy. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 36(1), 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572016v36n01a04
Gardini, G.L. (2016). Brazil: What Rise of What Power? Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12417
Garzón Pereira, J. (2013). Hierarchical regional orders: An analytical framework. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.007
Herzog, M. (2014). From cusp to hub? How Turkey tried to instrumentalize its cuspness as an aspiring multi-regional middle power. En M. Herzog y P. Robins (eds.), The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations (pp. 42-59).Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768472-3
Holbraad, C. (1972). El papel de las potencias medias en la política internacional. Estudios Internacionales, 5(17), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.1972.18879
Hulse, M. (2016). Regional Powers and Leadership in Regional Institutions: Nigeria in ECOWAS and South Africa in SADC. KFG Working Paper 76. Berlín: Freie Universität Berlin / Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe”.
Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00512.x
Hurrell, A. (2007). One world? Many worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs, 83(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00606.x
Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
Kahler, M. (2013). Rising powers and global governance: negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12041
Kardaş, Ș. (2013). Turkey: a Regional Power facing a Changing International System. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.861111
Kugler, J. y Organski, A. (1989). The Power Transition: a Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation. En M. Midlarsky (ed.), Handbook of War Studies. Nueva York: Routledge.
La República (13 de junio de 2006). CAN tiene futuro sin Chávez. La República. Recuperado de https://larepublica.pe/politica/277751-can-tiene-futuro-sin-chavez/
Lafer, C. (2002). La identidad internacional de Brasil. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lemke, D. (2010). Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capabilities. En D. Flemes (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Farnham: Ashgate.
Lima, M.R. y Hirst, M. (2006). Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities. International Affairs, 82(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x
Malamud, A. (2011). A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x
Marirrodriga, J. (3 de noviembre de 2006). Quiero una relación privilegiada con EE UU. El País. Recuperado de https://elpais.com/diario/2006/11/03/internacional/ 1162508402_850215.html
Marra, T. (2008). Brasil y la integración sudamericana a comienzos del siglo 21. Estudios Internacionales, 159, 97-110.
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018a). Relations with the Balkan Region. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-with-the-balkan-region.en.mfa
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018b). Turkey’sRelations with Southern Caucasus Countries. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.en.mfa?6bda4d8b-81a3-44d7-b8a0-5a287804f77b
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018c). Turkey’sRelations with the Arab Countries. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey_s-relations-with-the-arab-countries.en.mfa
Moreno, J. (6 de marzo de 2011). Nos hemos propuesto terminar con la pobreza extrema en cuatro años. El País. Recuperado de https://elpais.com/diario/2011/03/06/domingo/1299387158_850215.html
Mitchell, D. (2016). Regional Power? Yes, but What Kind? Paper presentado en ISA Asia Pacific, Hong Kong.
Narkilar, A. (2013). Negotiating the rise of power. International Affairs, 89(3), 516-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12033National Intelligence Council – NIC (2004). Mapping the Global Future. Pittsburgh: Government Printing Office. Recuperado de http://www.futurebrief.com/project2020.pdf
Nel, P. (2010). Redistribution and Recognition: what emerging regional powers want. Review of International Studies, 36, 951-974. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001385
Nolte, D. (2006). Potencias regionales en la política internacional: conceptos y enfoques de análisis. GIGA Working Paper 30. Hamburgo: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies / Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien.
Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, 36, 881-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X
Nolte, D. (2011). Regional powers and regional governance. En N. Godehardt y D. Nabers (eds.), Regional Powers and Regional Orders (pp. 49-67). Londres: Routledge.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
Öniş, Z. (2012). Turkey and the Arab Spring: between Ethics and Self-Interest. Insight Turkey, 14(3), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017639
Öniş, Z. y Kutlay. M. (2017). The dynamics of emerging middle-power influence in regional and global governance: the paradoxical case of Turkey. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(2), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1183586
Oskececi-Taner, B. (2005). The Impact of Institutionalized Ideas in Coalition Foreign Policy Making: Turkey as an Example, 1991-2002. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(3), 249-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00012.x
Özel, S. y Özkan, B. (2015). Illusions versus reality: Turkey’s approach to the Middle East and North Africa. Policy Brief, 200, 1-7.
Parlamento Europeo (2012). European Parliament resolution on the 2011 Progress Report on Turkey (2011/2889(RSP)). Recuperado dehttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-0189&language=EN
Parlar, E. (2016). Conceptualizing and testing the ‘emerging regional power’ of Turkey in the shifting international order. Third World Quarterly, 37(8), 1425-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1142367
Pedersen, T. (2002). Cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration. Review of International Studies, 28, 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502006770
Pesnya, V. (15 de agosto de 2015). Russia supports applications of India, Brazil for permanent membership in UN SC. Russia Beyond. Recuperado de https://www.rbth.com/world/2015/08/15/rusia-supports-applications-of-india-brazil-for-permanent-mem-bership-in-un-sc_390367
Prys, M. (2010). The variability of regional powers. Hamburgo: GIGA.
Robertson, J. (2017). Middle-power definitions: confusion reigns supreme. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(84), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608
Rosenblatt, F. (2006). Charlas para armar: Kurt Weyland, Constanza Moreira y Jorge Lanzaro. Hablemos sobre populismo. Montevideo Portal. Recuperado de https://www.montevideo.com.uy/ZZZ-No-se-usa/Charlas-para-armar-Kurt-Weyland-Constanza-Moreira-y-Jorge-Lanzaro-uc30564
Saraiva, M.G. (2012). Procesos de integración de América del Sur y el papel de Brasil. Revista CIDOB d'afers internacional, 97-98(abril), 87-100.
Schirm, S. (2005). Führungsindikatoren und Erklärungsvariablen für die neue internationale Politik Brasiliens. Lateinamerika Analysen, 4(11), 107-130.
Schoeman, M. (2000). South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power. African Security Review, 9(3), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050
Serfaty, S. (2011). Moving into a Post-Western World. The Washington Quarterly, 34(2), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2011.562080
Spektor, M. (2010). Ideias de ativismo regional: a transformação das leituras brasileiras da região. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000100002
Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-Western World. How Emerging Powers are remaking Global Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
The Guardian (13 de setiembre de 2011). Libya, Egypt, Syria and Middle East unrest.Recuperado de https://www.theguardian.com/world/middle-east-live/2011/sep/13/libya-syria-egypt-middle-east-unrest-live-updates
The White House (2013). Fact Sheet: U.S.-Turkey Partnership. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=122788
Vallès, J. (2010). Ciencia política: una introducción. Barcelona: Ariel.
Van Der Westhuizen, J. (1998). South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly, 19(3), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599814334
Vigevani, J. y Favaron, G. (2008). O papel da integração regional para o Brasil: univer-salismo, soberania e percepção das elites. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 51(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292008000100001
Walker, J. (2 de julio de 2011).The Return of the Turks as the Middle East’s Kingmaker. Huffpost. Recuperado de https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-return-of-the-turks-a_b_818402
Wight, M. (1978). Power Politics. Londres: Continuum.
Yilmaz, Ö. (2014). A constructivist analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy in 1980s and 2000s: The example of Turkey-U.S. relations. Dissertation im fach Politikwissenschaft. Siegen: Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Siegen.
Young, O. (1991). Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization, 45(3), 281-308.
Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American World. Nueva York: W.W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.00993.x
Zibechi, R. (2012). Brasil potencia. Entre la integración regional y un nuevo imperialismo. Bogotá: Ediciones Desde Abajo.
Descargas
Derechos de autor 2019 Sebastien Adins
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0.
