¿La región como trampolín para la emergencia global? Las estrategias regionales de Brasil y Turquía
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.201901.001Palabras clave:
potencias regionales, potencias emergentes, jerarquía de poder, roles de política exterior, tesis del trampolín, Brasil, TurquíaResumen
Tomando en consideración el carácter transitorio del actual sistema internacional, el presente artículo pretende analizar la relación entre la emergencia global de diversas potencias del Sur y su proyección regional. Luego de una exploración de la literatura académica sobre las potencias regionales, medias y emergentes, se realiza una comparación entre las estrategias regionales de dos Estados, Brasil y Turquía, basada en cuatro dimensiones: sus recursos (relativos) de poder, la autopercepción respecto a la región, las estrategias y roles propios de su política regional y la recepción de dicha proyección por los vecinos y las principales potencias extrarregionales. A partir de esta comparación, se determina de qué manera estas estrategias regionales se relacionan con la aspiración de emergencia global de ambas potencias.
Descargas
Citas
Abou-El-Fadl, R. (2012). Arab perceptions of Contemporary Turkish Foreign Policy: Cautious Engagement and the Question of Independence. En K. Öktem, A. Kadıoĝlu y M. Karli. Another Empire? A decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party (pp. 231-257). Estambul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
Acharya, A. (2018). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity.
Akgün, M., Perçinoğlu, G. y Senyücel, S. (2009). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East. Estambul: Tesev Publications.
Akgün, M. y Senyücel, S. (2012). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2012. Estambul: Tesev Publications.
Akgün, M. y Senyücel, S. (2013). The perception of Turkey in the Middle East 2013. Estambul: Tesev Foreign Policy Programme.
Almeida, P. (2010). Never before Seen in Brazil: Luís Inácio da Silva ́s grand diplomacy. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53(2), 160-177. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000200009
Altunışık, M. (2014). Geopolitical representation of Turkey’s cuspness. Discourse and practice. En M. Herzog y P. Robins, The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations (pp. 25-41). Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768472-2
Amorim, C. (2010). Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003-2010): An over-view. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53, 214-240. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300013
Aporrea (17 de diciembre de 2008). Presidente Chávez: «El liderazgo de Brasil es importante, pero no el único». Recuperado de https://www.aporrea.org/actualidad/n125702.html
Burges, S. (2009). Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. https://doi.org/10.5744/florida/9780813033334.001.0001
Buzan, B. y Wæver, O. (2004). Regions and Powers. The Structure of International Security.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cagaptay, S. (16 de agosto de 2013). The Muslim Brotherhood’s Fall Lands Turkey an Unexpected Ally: Kurds. The Atlantic. Recuperado de https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/the-muslim-brotherhoods-fall-lands-turkey-an-unexpected-ally-kurds
Comisión Europea (2007). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council - Towards an EU-Brazil Strategic Partnership. (COM/2007/0281). Recuperado de https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52007DC0281
Committee on Armed Services. United States Senate. (2011). The current and future world-wide threats to the National Security of the United States. Senate Hearing 112-159. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Recuperado de https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112shrg71354/html/CHRG-112shrg71354.htm
Cooper, D. (2011). Challenging Contemporary Notions of Middle Power Influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative for ‘Middle Power Theory’. Foreign Policy Analysis, 7, 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2011.00140.x
Cooper, D. (2013). Somewhere between Great and Small: Disentangling the Conceptual Jumble of Middle, Regional, and ‘Niche’ Powers. The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14(2), 23-35. Recuperado de https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1014484.pdf
Corporación Latinobarómetro (2012). Informe 2011. Santiago: Corporación Latinobarómetro.
Couto, L. (2007). O horizonte regional do Brasil e a construção da América do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 50, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292007000100009
Cox, R. y Sinclair, T. (1996). Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607905
Davutoğlu, A. (Noviembre de 2011). Vision 2023: Turkey’s Foreign Policy Objectives. En Goldman Sachs, Turkey Investor Conference: The road to 2023. Londres, Reino Unido. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/speech-entitled-_vision-2023_-turkey_s-foreign-policy-objectives__-delivered-by-h_e_-ahmet-davutoglu_-minister-of-foreign-af.en.mfa
Davutoglu, A. (2013). Turkey’s Mediation: critical reflections from the field. Middle East Policy, 20(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/mepo.12005
Del Arenal, C. (1983). Poder y relaciones internacionales: un análisis conceptual. Revista de Estudios Internacionales, 4(3), 501-524.
Destradi, S. (2010). Regional powers and their strategies: empire, hegemony and lead-ership. Review of International Studies, 36, 903-930. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001361
Devinit (2017). Global Humanitarian Assistance Report 2017. Bristol: Development Initiatives. Recuperado de http://devinit.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/GHA-Report-2017-Full-report.pdf
Dewitt, D. y Christie, R. (2007). Los poderes medios y la seguridad regional. En J. Tokatlian (Comp.), India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales(pp. 55-95). Buenos Aires: Zorzal.
Eksi, M. (2016). The Rise and Fall of Soft Power in Turkish Foreign Policy during JDP. Saarbrücken: LambertAcademic Publishing.
ESI (4 de diciembre de 2010). Is Turkey’s Balkan policy today inspired by a post-modern vision of the world? A pre-modern one? And does it matter how we call it? Recuperado de http://www.esiweb.org/rumeliobserver/2010/12/04/multikulti-and-the-future-of-turkish-balkan-policy
Fisher, N. (2012). ’Democratic Depth’: The Missing Ingredient in Turkey’s Domestic/Foreign Policy Nexus. K. Öktem, A. Kadıoĝlu y M. Karli, Another Empire? A decade of Turkey’s Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party (pp. 61-75). Estambul: Istanbul Bilgi University Press.
Flemes, D. (2007). Conceptualizing Regional Power in International Relations – Lessons from the South African Case. Giga Working Paper, 53. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1000123
Flemes, D. y Wojczewski, T. (2011). Contested Leadership in Comparative Perspective: Power Strategies in South Asia and South America. Asian Journal of Latin American Studies, 24(1), 1-27.
Föhrig, A. (2007). Resistencias y equilibrios regionales. En J. Tokatlian (Comp.), India, Brasil y Sudáfrica. El Impacto de las nuevas potencias regionales. Buenos Aires: Zorzal.
Fonseca, P., Paes, L. y Cunha, A. (2016). The concept of emerging power in international politics and economy. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, 36(1), 46-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572016v36n01a04
Gardini, G.L. (2016). Brazil: What Rise of What Power? Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12417
Garzón Pereira, J. (2013). Hierarchical regional orders: An analytical framework. Journal of Policy Modeling, 36, 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2013.10.007
Herzog, M. (2014). From cusp to hub? How Turkey tried to instrumentalize its cuspness as an aspiring multi-regional middle power. En M. Herzog y P. Robins (eds.), The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations (pp. 42-59).Nueva York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315768472-3
Holbraad, C. (1972). El papel de las potencias medias en la política internacional. Estudios Internacionales, 5(17), 53-75. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-3769.1972.18879
Hulse, M. (2016). Regional Powers and Leadership in Regional Institutions: Nigeria in ECOWAS and South Africa in SADC. KFG Working Paper 76. Berlín: Freie Universität Berlin / Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe”.
Hurrell, A. (2006). Hegemony, liberalism and global order: what space for would-be great powers? International Affairs, 82(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00512.x
Hurrell, A. (2007). One world? Many worlds? The place of regions in the study of international society. International Affairs, 83(1), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2007.00606.x
Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/0258934032000147282
Kahler, M. (2013). Rising powers and global governance: negotiating change in a resilient status quo. International Affairs, 89(3), 711-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12041
Kardaş, Ș. (2013). Turkey: a Regional Power facing a Changing International System. Turkish Studies, 14(4), 637-660. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2013.861111
Kugler, J. y Organski, A. (1989). The Power Transition: a Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation. En M. Midlarsky (ed.), Handbook of War Studies. Nueva York: Routledge.
La República (13 de junio de 2006). CAN tiene futuro sin Chávez. La República. Recuperado de https://larepublica.pe/politica/277751-can-tiene-futuro-sin-chavez/
Lafer, C. (2002). La identidad internacional de Brasil. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lemke, D. (2010). Dimensions of Hard Power: Regional Leadership and Material Capabilities. En D. Flemes (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers. Farnham: Ashgate.
Lima, M.R. y Hirst, M. (2006). Brazil as an intermediate state and regional power: action, choice and responsibilities. International Affairs, 82(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2006.00513.x
Malamud, A. (2011). A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2011.00123.x
Marirrodriga, J. (3 de noviembre de 2006). Quiero una relación privilegiada con EE UU. El País. Recuperado de https://elpais.com/diario/2006/11/03/internacional/ 1162508402_850215.html
Marra, T. (2008). Brasil y la integración sudamericana a comienzos del siglo 21. Estudios Internacionales, 159, 97-110.
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018a). Relations with the Balkan Region. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/relations-with-the-balkan-region.en.mfa
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018b). Turkey’sRelations with Southern Caucasus Countries. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/sub.en.mfa?6bda4d8b-81a3-44d7-b8a0-5a287804f77b
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de la República de Turquía – MFA (2018c). Turkey’sRelations with the Arab Countries. Recuperado de http://www.mfa.gov.tr/turkey_s-relations-with-the-arab-countries.en.mfa
Moreno, J. (6 de marzo de 2011). Nos hemos propuesto terminar con la pobreza extrema en cuatro años. El País. Recuperado de https://elpais.com/diario/2011/03/06/domingo/1299387158_850215.html
Mitchell, D. (2016). Regional Power? Yes, but What Kind? Paper presentado en ISA Asia Pacific, Hong Kong.
Narkilar, A. (2013). Negotiating the rise of power. International Affairs, 89(3), 516-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12033National Intelligence Council – NIC (2004). Mapping the Global Future. Pittsburgh: Government Printing Office. Recuperado de http://www.futurebrief.com/project2020.pdf
Nel, P. (2010). Redistribution and Recognition: what emerging regional powers want. Review of International Studies, 36, 951-974. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510001385
Nolte, D. (2006). Potencias regionales en la política internacional: conceptos y enfoques de análisis. GIGA Working Paper 30. Hamburgo: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies / Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien.
Nolte, D. (2010). How to compare regional powers: analytical concepts and research topics. Review of International Studies, 36, 881-901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021051000135X
Nolte, D. (2011). Regional powers and regional governance. En N. Godehardt y D. Nabers (eds.), Regional Powers and Regional Orders (pp. 49-67). Londres: Routledge.
Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Cambridge: Perseus Books.
Öniş, Z. (2012). Turkey and the Arab Spring: between Ethics and Self-Interest. Insight Turkey, 14(3), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2017639
Öniş, Z. y Kutlay. M. (2017). The dynamics of emerging middle-power influence in regional and global governance: the paradoxical case of Turkey. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(2), 164-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2016.1183586
Oskececi-Taner, B. (2005). The Impact of Institutionalized Ideas in Coalition Foreign Policy Making: Turkey as an Example, 1991-2002. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(3), 249-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00012.x
Özel, S. y Özkan, B. (2015). Illusions versus reality: Turkey’s approach to the Middle East and North Africa. Policy Brief, 200, 1-7.
Parlamento Europeo (2012). European Parliament resolution on the 2011 Progress Report on Turkey (2011/2889(RSP)). Recuperado dehttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/ getDoc.do?type=MOTION&reference=B7-2012-0189&language=EN
Parlar, E. (2016). Conceptualizing and testing the ‘emerging regional power’ of Turkey in the shifting international order. Third World Quarterly, 37(8), 1425-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1142367
Pedersen, T. (2002). Cooperative hegemony: power, ideas and institutions in regional integration. Review of International Studies, 28, 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210502006770
Pesnya, V. (15 de agosto de 2015). Russia supports applications of India, Brazil for permanent membership in UN SC. Russia Beyond. Recuperado de https://www.rbth.com/world/2015/08/15/rusia-supports-applications-of-india-brazil-for-permanent-mem-bership-in-un-sc_390367
Prys, M. (2010). The variability of regional powers. Hamburgo: GIGA.
Robertson, J. (2017). Middle-power definitions: confusion reigns supreme. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 71(84), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1293608
Rosenblatt, F. (2006). Charlas para armar: Kurt Weyland, Constanza Moreira y Jorge Lanzaro. Hablemos sobre populismo. Montevideo Portal. Recuperado de https://www.montevideo.com.uy/ZZZ-No-se-usa/Charlas-para-armar-Kurt-Weyland-Constanza-Moreira-y-Jorge-Lanzaro-uc30564
Saraiva, M.G. (2012). Procesos de integración de América del Sur y el papel de Brasil. Revista CIDOB d'afers internacional, 97-98(abril), 87-100.
Schirm, S. (2005). Führungsindikatoren und Erklärungsvariablen für die neue internationale Politik Brasiliens. Lateinamerika Analysen, 4(11), 107-130.
Schoeman, M. (2000). South Africa as an Emerging Middle Power. African Security Review, 9(3), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2000.9628050
Serfaty, S. (2011). Moving into a Post-Western World. The Washington Quarterly, 34(2), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2011.562080
Spektor, M. (2010). Ideias de ativismo regional: a transformação das leituras brasileiras da região. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 53(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000100002
Stuenkel, O. (2016). Post-Western World. How Emerging Powers are remaking Global Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
The Guardian (13 de setiembre de 2011). Libya, Egypt, Syria and Middle East unrest.Recuperado de https://www.theguardian.com/world/middle-east-live/2011/sep/13/libya-syria-egypt-middle-east-unrest-live-updates
The White House (2013). Fact Sheet: U.S.-Turkey Partnership. Recuperado de http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=122788
Vallès, J. (2010). Ciencia política: una introducción. Barcelona: Ariel.
Van Der Westhuizen, J. (1998). South Africa’s Emergence as a Middle Power. Third World Quarterly, 19(3), 435-455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436599814334
Vigevani, J. y Favaron, G. (2008). O papel da integração regional para o Brasil: univer-salismo, soberania e percepção das elites. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, 51(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292008000100001
Walker, J. (2 de julio de 2011).The Return of the Turks as the Middle East’s Kingmaker. Huffpost. Recuperado de https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-return-of-the-turks-a_b_818402
Wight, M. (1978). Power Politics. Londres: Continuum.
Yilmaz, Ö. (2014). A constructivist analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy in 1980s and 2000s: The example of Turkey-U.S. relations. Dissertation im fach Politikwissenschaft. Siegen: Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Siegen.
Young, O. (1991). Political Leadership and Regime Formation: On the Development of Institutions in International Society. International Organization, 45(3), 281-308.
Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American World. Nueva York: W.W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.00993.x
Zibechi, R. (2012). Brasil potencia. Entre la integración regional y un nuevo imperialismo. Bogotá: Ediciones Desde Abajo.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2019 Sebastien Adins
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
