In search of a regulation: notes on the subjective scope of res judicata in collective processes

Authors

  • Raúl Feijóo Cambiaso Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Alumno de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  • Giacomo Montiel Ibarguren Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Alumno de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  • Eduardo Iñiguez Ortiz Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Alumno de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  • Renzo Mayor Mayor Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Alumno de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Keywords:

collective process, subjective scope of the res judicata, burden dynamic of the proof

Abstract

The paper analyzes the various existing systems on the subjective scope of the sentence issued in a collective process, showing their preference for the pro et contra with the option of opt out for the effects of the res judicata. Likewise, it is argued that the theory of the burden dynamic of the proof may represent a solution to the fact that the plaintiffs of the collective group may be affected by a poor procedural strategy in the first process where an unfavorable judgment was obtained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-03-07

How to Cite

Feijóo Cambiaso, R., Montiel Ibarguren, G., Iñiguez Ortiz, E., & Mayor Mayor, R. (2017). In search of a regulation: notes on the subjective scope of res judicata in collective processes. Revista De La Maestría En Derecho Procesal, 7(2), 234–272. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoprocesal/article/view/19706

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Ponencias

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de la Maestría en Derecho Procesal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.