Property regimes in international marriages: applicable law and marital covenants permitted under private international law

Authors

  • María del Carmen Delgado Menéndez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-9559

    Abogada y magíster por la PUCP y profesora asociada de la misma universidad en Derecho Civil e Internacional Privado (DIPr). Cursos internacionales de posgraduación en la Facultad de Derecho de la UNAM de México, de la PUCP, de la Universidad de Passo Fundo de Brasil, de la Pontificia Universidad Católica Madre y Maestra de Santo Domingo y de la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Especialista en el diseño de reformas, dirección de proyectos en temas de derechos de propiedad, derecho civil y DIPr en Perú, Latinoamérica, el Caribe, Medio Oriente, Asia y África, con publicaciones nacionales e internacionales en dichas materias. Miembro del Consejo Directivo de la Facultad de Derecho y del Consejo Directivo de la Maestría en Investigación Jurídica de la PUCP.
    Correo electrónico: mariadelcarmendelgadom@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.202201.008

Keywords:

Private international law, International marriages, Economic patrimonial regimes, Marital agreements, Connecting factors and applicable law

Abstract

The growing number of “international” marriages, with nationalities, domiciles and properties that link the spouses with various countries, and that generate patrimonial relations both between the spouses and with third parties, highlights the importance of the issue related to the patrimonial economic regime of such marriages. This situation demands our attention to the rules of private international law which will be the basis to determine what is the law applicable to the economic patrimonial regime of an international marriage, since it is precisely this law that will define, among others, which is the patrimonial regime that governs each marriage, what are the effects of said regime, what are the permitted covenants and arrangements allowed between the spouses in this matter, as well as the legal ways for the spouses to change the current regime today. In this article we refer particularly to what international marriages must take into account in order to determine what law is applicable to their property regime, which are the most widely applied patrimonial economic regimes around the world and what are the main similarities and differences between these regimes. We illustrate the importance of this theme by relating it to increasingly frequent circumstances in which spouses repeatedly change the place of the marital domicile, involving various countries and generating a series of questions regarding the law that will be applied in order to determine which property regime governs them, what are the main characteristics and effects of said regime, as well as the legal means to which the spouses can utilize to modify said regime. As an example, we resort to the assumption of an international marriage that binds Spain and Peru, as it composed of spouses who had their first domicile in Madrid, Spain, and today reside in Lima, Peru. We indicate what is the connecting factor provided for in the Peruvian norms of private international law so as to determine which is the law regulating the patrimonial regime of an international marriage. We also refer to the property regimes of marriages provided in both the Peruvian and the Spanish legislation, including their characteristics and effects and the existing legal means for the spouses to modify said regime. Finally, some specific proposals for regulatory modification are formulated and aimed at providing Peru with a regulatory framework that provides greater predictability and legal certainty to the property regimes of international marriages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2022-10-21

How to Cite

Delgado Menéndez, M. del C. (2022). Property regimes in international marriages: applicable law and marital covenants permitted under private international law. Agenda Internacional, 29(40), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.18800/agenda.202201.008

Issue

Section

Artículos