The Legal Notion of Environmental Damage and a Peculiar Argumentation of the Court of Environmental Enforcement

Authors

  • Lorenzo de la Puente Brunke Universidad de Houston
    Abogado. Magister en Derecho Ambiental y Energético por la Escuela de Leyes de la Universidad de Houston, Texas, con una becaotorgada en 1998 por la Comisión Fulbright. Socio del Estudio De la Puente Abogados.

Keywords:

Environmental damage, Environmental risk, Court of Environmental Control, Maximum permissible limit, Infraction, Penalty, Environmental responsibility

Abstract

A proper normative interpretation is undoubtedly one of the pillars of Law, all this thanks that brings a juridical security level and predictability to all the parties involved. In that sense the author submits a critique about the criteria that have been emitted by the diverse public  organisms  in  environmental  material,  specifically  with  the  juridical  concept  of«environmental damage» in the excess inside Maximum Permissible Limit. Also the article presents an objective focus through a temporal development of diverse administrative resolutions, which are established as incorrect on the basis of a wide and forced interpretation about environmental damage, concept applied not only in a case with real effects, but also potential ones. Finally, this is provided by the author as a defect, that although actually exists a remedial intention, this must begin from a clear conceptual framework in normative and resolutive topics by equal.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-05-04

How to Cite

Puente Brunke, L. de la. (2014). The Legal Notion of Environmental Damage and a Peculiar Argumentation of the Court of Environmental Enforcement. Derecho & Sociedad, (42), 169–178. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/12473

Issue

Section

Medio Ambiente