Essential aspects of the evidence in the Peruvian sanctioning administrative procedure: right to evidence, burden and standard of proof

Authors

  • Juan Pablo Macassi Zavala Hernández & Cía. Abogados

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, especialista en Gestión Minera por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, y en Arbitraje de Contrataciones con el Estado por la Universidad ESAN. Asociado Senior de Hernández & Cía. Abogados. Miembro del Consejo de Egresados del Círculo de Derecho Administrativo – CDA. Contacto: jmacassi@ehernandez.com.pe

  • Elvis Edison Salazar Ortiz Hernández & Cía. Abogados

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Asociado de Hernández & Cía. Abogados. Exmiembro de Derecho & Sociedad. Contacto: esalazar@ehernandez.com.pe

Keywords:

Sanctioning administrative procedure, Sanctioning administrative law, Theory of evidence, Right to evidence, Standard of proof, Burden of proof

Abstract

This Article focuses on the essential aspects of evidence in the administrative sanctioning procedure. These aspects correspond to (i) the importance of truth in the administrative sanctioning procedure, (ii) the fundamental right to evidence, (iii) conditions in the valuation of evidence, (iv) the burden of proof, and, (v) the standard of proof required to sanction. With the deepening of these concepts, we will be able to reduce spaces of arbitrariness in the exercise of the sanctioning power, in order to ensure that sanctions are only applied to real offenders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-07-21

How to Cite

Macassi Zavala, J. P., & Salazar Ortiz, E. E. (2020). Essential aspects of the evidence in the Peruvian sanctioning administrative procedure: right to evidence, burden and standard of proof. Derecho & Sociedad, 1(54), 337–356. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/22425

Issue

Section

Derecho Administrativo Sancionador