MGPDI: modelo de gestión de la I+D+i en las organizaciones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/360gestion.201702.001Keywords:
research, development, innovation, R&D&I, management modelAbstract
A strategy to promote innovation in organizations consists of the adoption of Research, Development and Innovation (R&D&I) management systems. This paper aims at describing the current situation of the new R&D&I Management Model (MGPDI) that is applicable to any organization, independently of the size, type and activity. The novelty is in the definition of the: 1) Process Reference Model MR-MGPDI based on innovation best practices and on requirements of the Brazilian ABNT NBR 16501 and the Spanish AENOR UNE 166001-166002 standards; 2) Process Assessment Model MA-MGPDI based on the family of standards ISO/IEC 33000 for process assessment. Until December 2016 there are three goals: 1) to develop, test and publish two MGPDI guides (General Guide and Assessment Guide); 2) train the first implementation consultants, assessors and instructors; 3) perform three pilot of MGPDI implementation and assessment in organizations in southern Brazil, including tests with two online software support tools (SGPDI and MGPDI AA). MGPDI is a process model with great potential of replication in Latin America and Caribbean countries.
Downloads
References
ABNT NBR 16501 (2011) Diretrizes para sistemas de gestão da pesquisa, do desenvolvimento e da inovação (PDI). Norma Brasileira.
AENOR UNE 166001 (2006) Gestión de la I+D+i: Requisitos de un proyecto de I+D+i. Norma española.
AENOR UNE 166002 (2014) Gestión de la I+D+i: Requisitos del sistema de gestión de la I+D+i. Norma española.
Altshuller, Genrich (1999) Innovation Algorithm. Worcester: Technical
Innovation Center.
Associação para Promoção da Excelência do Software Brasileiro (SOFTEX) (2015) MPS.BR – Guia de Avaliação. Disponible en: <http://www.softex.br/mpsbr>.
Centro de Tecnologia da Informação Renato Archer (CTI Renato Archer) (2013) Método de Avaliação CERTICS: versão 1.1. Disponible en: <http://www.certics.cti. gov.br>.
Belussi, Fiorenza; Alessia Sammarra & Silvia Rita Sedita (2010) «Learning at the boundaries in an ‘Open Regional Innovation System’: A focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry». Research Policy, 39 (6), pp. 710-721. Disponible en: <http://economia.unipd.it/sites/decon. unipd.it/files/20100113.pdf>; .
Charan, Ram (2015) The Attacker’s Advantage: Turning Uncertainty into Breakthrough Opportunities. Nueva York: Publish Affairs.
Chesbrough, Henry (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: HBS Press.
CMMI Product Team (CMMI) (2014) Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) Version 1.3b: Method Definition Document. Pittsburgh, PA: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
Ferreira, Rafael & Paulo Cauchick Miguel (2013) «Análise Comparativa sobre Processos de Inovação da Literatura com a Norma Brasileira de Gestão da Inovação». Exacta, 11 (3), pp. 285-297.
Hansen, Morten & Julian Birkinshaw (2007) «The innovation value chain». Harvard Business Reviev, 85 (6), pp. 121-130.
ISO/IEC 33000 (2015) Information technology - Process assessment (new family ISO/IEC 33000 updates ISO/IEC 15504 series).
Kalinowski, Marcos y otros (2015) «Software Process Improvement Results in Brazil Based on the MPS-SW Model». Software Quality Professional Magazine, 17 (4), pp. 15-28. Disponible en: .
Montoni, Mariano Angel, Ana Regina Rocha & Kival Chaves Weber (2009) «MPS.BR: A successful program for software process improvement in Brazil». Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 14 (5), pp. 289-300. Disponible en: <https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.428>.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2002) Frascati Manual. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (sexta edición). París: OECD. Disponible en: .
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (tercera edición). París: OECD. Disponible en: <http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/ download/9205111e.pdf?expires=1491 795781&id=id&accname=guest& checksum=038DF592FE65AEBAA94005 E9F258DA4A>; .
Papageorge, Andrew (2004) GoInnovate! A Practical Guide to Swift, Continual and Effective Innovation. San Diego, CA: GoInnovate! Publishing.
Ranga, Maringa & Henry Etzkowitz (2013) «Triple helix systems: An analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society». Industry and Higher Education, 27 (3), pp. 237-262. Disponible en: ; <https://doi.org/10.5367/ ihe.2013.0165>.
Ritter, Donna (2008) Risk Breakdown Structure (RBS). Disponible en: .
Teboul, James (2008) Serviços em Cena: o diferencial que agrega valor ao seu negócio. Brasilia: ELSEVIER / INSEAD / CAMPUS / CNI-IEL/NC.
Valença, Raquel (2016) «Pesquisa Multissetorial da Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Paraná (FIEP). Observatórios Sesi/Senai/FIEP». Gazeta do Povo, 12/11/2016, p. 32.
Weber, Kival Chaves & otros (2015a) «MGPDI: Modelo de gestión de la I+D+i en las organizaciones». I Congreso Internacional de Gestión de la Innovación, 28 septiembre–2 octubre 2015, PUCP, Lima, Perú. Disponible en: <http://congreso.pucp.edu.pe/ gestion-innovacion/ediciones-anteriores/icongreso- internacional-ciencias-la-gestioninnovacion/? seccion=resumen>.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 360: Revista de Ciencias de la Gestión

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







