Defacing Memory: (Un) tying Peru’s Memory Knots

Authors

  • Cynthia E. Milton Université de Montréal
    Estudia la historia de los Andes, en particular las representaciones históricas dela violencia en el Perú contemporáneo y la percepción de la pobreza en el Ecuador colonial. Es autora de The Many Meanings of Poverty: Colonialism, Social Compacts, and Assistance in 18th Century Ecuador (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007); ganadora del Premio Bolton-Johnson de la Conferencia sobre Historia de América Latina; co-editora de The Art of Truth-telling about Authoritarian Rule (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2005) y Curating Difficult Knowledge: Violent Past in Public Places (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), y editora de Art from a Fractured Past: Memory and Truth-Telling in Post-Shining Path Peru (Durham: Duke University Press, 2011). Ha escrito varios artículos sobre el esclarecimiento histórico post Sendero Luminoso en Perú. Es profesora asociada y tiene la Cátedra de Investigación de Canadá en Historia Latinoamericana en el Departamento de Historia de la Universidad de Montreal. Correoelectrónico: cynthia.milton@umontreal.ca, cynthia.milton@mac.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201501.002

Keywords:

conflict, memory, vandalism

Abstract

This article examines opposing currents in Peru’s collective memory of their bloody internal war (1980-2000) through an analysis of acts of vandalism perpetrated against one of the country’s few sites of memory, El ojo que llora, in Lima. ‘Vandalism’ in this article is understood as a form of writing (though a violent one) of an alternative vision of the past. Originally intended as a space for remembering and paying homage to the victims of the armed conflict, the site has become a space for contesting memories. As a site of performance of memory and human rights claims, and especially as the target of continued defacement, El ojo que llora has become a stage on which the presence of the past —in its still-conflictual strains— is made visible for national and international publics. It thus refuses the very closure that government narratives would impose, and thereby keeps open public engagement with the past. The ongoing conflicts over the past made visible at this site point to the struggles to define an overarching memory, and in the processthe very meaning of ‘victim’ is constrained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-07-02

How to Cite

Milton, C. E. (2015). Defacing Memory: (Un) tying Peru’s Memory Knots. Anthropologica Del Departamento De Ciencias Sociales, 33(34), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.201501.002