Verdad: un debate tradicional revisado
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.200702.004Keywords:
Truth, Deflationism, Intrinsicalism, Coherentism, CorrespondenceAbstract
“Truth: A Traditional Debate Reviewed”. This paper proposes a critical review of the presuppositions at the background of the traditional discussion on truth. Despite acknowledging that the said discussion rationalizes many of the movements and tentatives of its main characters to clarify the facts, it isascertained that, since it is centered in a reductive analyses of truth, it is not apt to generate the most adequate interpretation of the same. The theories in dispute will be expounded and criticized: deflationism, intrinsicalism, and both forms of relationism –coherentism and correspondence. An alternative to theanalytical-theoretical approach to truth –which in its different guises has served as basis of the traditional debate– will be purported.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Areté

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.