One, two, three... fourteen! Or sixty-six Trust and notion of the final consumer: a case of electronic commerce in consumer protection

Authors

  • Edwin Gabriel Aldana Ramos Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Egresado de la Maestría en Administración de Negocios de la Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola. Secretario Técnico de la Comisión de Protección al Consumidor N° 2 del INDECOPI.

Keywords:

Electronic commerce, Consumer, Habituality, Contract, Price, Error

Abstract

This article is based on an electronic commerce case in consumer protection. We are not unprotected by the absence of a special regulation, but we must build the foundations for this trade to develop properly. Who put a complaint can be considered final consumer? because it does not acquire one, two, three or fourteen, (a reference to Vertigo of U2) but sixty-six products to S /. 1 that regularly cost more than S /. 1 000. Is the last agreement improved? and can the supplier of the operation carried out be withdrawn when considering the price of their offered products derisory? I incide in the need to generate confidence in the consumer, and that this is possible if the provider gives security, simple but gravitating.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-11-07

How to Cite

Aldana Ramos, E. G. (2018). One, two, three. fourteen! Or sixty-six Trust and notion of the final consumer: a case of electronic commerce in consumer protection. Derecho & Sociedad, (50), 13–25. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20369

Issue

Section

Derecho Administrativo