The National Curriculum of Basic Education in debate: children’s rights and limits of parental responsibility

Authors

  • Beatriz May Ling Ramírez Huaroto Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Magistra en Derecho Constitucional por la Pontificia Universidad  atólica del Perú. Docente en la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos y la Maestría en Derecho de Familia de la Universidad Femenina del sagrado Corazón.

Keywords:

Education, Children’s rights, Parental responsibility, Gender, Democratic and Social State of Law, The National Curriculum for Basic Education

Abstract

In January of 2017, an acción popular lawsuit was admitted against the National Curriculum of Basic Education. The plaintiff, represented by six people, claimed that the Curriculum transgressed the “right of parents to choose the education of their children based on their own convictions”. Six months later, the court resolved to cancel some of the references to the gender equality approach in the Curriculum, noting that it was not the result of a deliberative process. This article argues that the debate ignores the fact that children’s rights are related but autonomous of their caregivers. Also, the scope of an education with a gender approach has not been determined yet, putting in danger the implementation of an education which allows to build a plural citizenship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-06-04

How to Cite

Ramírez Huaroto, B. M. L. (2019). The National Curriculum of Basic Education in debate: children’s rights and limits of parental responsibility. Derecho & Sociedad, (51), 89–102. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20861

Issue

Section

Parte Orgánica Constitucional