Law No. 30683 that restores pension leveling in the Military Police Pension System: Does it turn out to be constitutional or unconstitutional?

Authors

  • César Abanto Revilla Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado y Maestro en Derecho por la USMP. Profesor de Seguridad Social en las Maestrías de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social de la PUCP y la USMP. Miembro de la Sociedad Peruana de Derecho del Trabajo y la Seguridad Social.

  • Javier Paitán Martínez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la UNMSM. Adjunto de Docencia de Seguridad Social en la Maestría de Derecho del Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social de la PUCP. Miembro principal del Círculo de Estudios Laborales y de la Seguridad Social (CELSS) de la UNMSM.

Keywords:

Pension reform, Pensioner leveling, Constitutional limit to the pension reform, Military and police pension system, Military and police personnel

Abstract

The First Final and Transitory Provision of the Political Constitution of Peru establishes the constitutional limits to the freedom of configuration of the pension regimes (current and future) by the legislator, being one of the main ones, the constitutional prohibition of the leveling, homologation or renewal pension that was made concrete with the elimination of the so-called “mirror effect” or “live ID”. In the present work, it will be analyzed whether the -recent and last- reform made to the Military Military Pension Regime, by means of Law N °30683, was developed within the aforementioned constitutional limit, in order to determine if said norm turns out to be constitutional or unconstitutional.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-06-04

How to Cite

Abanto Revilla, C., & Paitán Martínez, J. (2019). Law No. 30683 that restores pension leveling in the Military Police Pension System: Does it turn out to be constitutional or unconstitutional?. Derecho & Sociedad, (51), 143–159. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20866

Issue

Section

Parte Orgánica Constitucional