The evidence in the sanctioning administrative Law in Perú and Spain

Authors

  • Mariano Magide Herrero Uría Menéndez

    Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Valladolid, España. Socio de Uría Menéndez. Profesor Colaborador de Derecho Administrativo en la Universidad Pontificia de Comillas (Madrid). Contacto: mariano.magide@uria.com

  • Carlos González Prada Arriarán Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría

    Magister en Análisis Económico del Derecho y Políticas Públicas por la Universidad de Salamanca, España. Asociado Principal de Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría. Contacto: carlos.gonzalezprada@ppulegal.com

Keywords:

Administrative sanctioning procedure, Evidence, Evidence for indications, Evidence for presumptions, Comparative Law, Burden of proof

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the main aspects related to the regulation of the evidence in the Peruvian and Spanish sanctioning administrative law, with special emphasis on the regulation and use of the evidence for indications. For this, the authors will review the applicable legislation in both legal systems, as well as various judicial and administrative resolutions issued with respect to the evidence, and, in particular, in relation to the validity criteria required for the evidence for indications in the sanctioning administrative field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-07-21

How to Cite

Magide Herrero, M., & González Prada Arriarán, C. (2020). The evidence in the sanctioning administrative Law in Perú and Spain. Derecho & Sociedad, 1(54), 323–336. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/22423

Issue

Section

Derecho Administrativo Sancionador