Sanctioning regime in public procurement in contraposition of minimum guarantees foreseen in the sanctioning regime of Unique Ordered Text of the General Administrative Procedure Law of Peru

Authors

  • Jhojan Terrones Jancco Investigador independiente

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú con título profesional de Segunda Especialidad en Derecho Administrativo (PUCP). Abogado Asociado del Estudio Zegarra & Schipper Abogados Consultores. Contacto: j.terrones@pucp.pe
  • Giordano Castillo Andía Investigador independiente

    Bachiller en Derecho por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Asistente del Área Regulatorio Administrativo del Estudio Saco-Vertiz & Landerer (BBGS Abogados). Contacto: victorgiordanocas1995@gmail.com

Keywords:

Administrative sanctioning authority, Administrative sanctions, Public procurement, Administrative sanctioning procedure, Minimum guarantees

Abstract

This paper explains the legal nature of the administrative power to impose sanctions, and how the OSCE Contracting Court acts based on this power. Likewise, it calls for a deep legal reflection, insofar as the sanctioning regime in the field of public procurement violates any of the minimum guarantees provided for in the TUO of Law No. 27444, Law on General Administrative Procedure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-22

How to Cite

Terrones Jancco, J., & Castillo Andía, G. (2020). Sanctioning regime in public procurement in contraposition of minimum guarantees foreseen in the sanctioning regime of Unique Ordered Text of the General Administrative Procedure Law of Peru. Derecho & Sociedad, 2(54), 195–207. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/22443

Issue

No. 54 (2020): Tomo II

Section

Derecho Administrativo Sancionador Especial

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.