A «halfway» policy. Reflections on the policy for Indigenous Peoples of Recent Contact in Brazil

Authors

  • Clarisse Jabur Departamento de Antropología, Universidad de Brasilia, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-3350

    Licenciada en Ciencias Sociales con Título en Antropología de la Universidad de Brasilia. Magíster en Antropología Social de la Universidad de Brasilia. Trabajó en la Tierra Indígena Yanomami de 2002 a 2010 como asesora de campo. Es Indigenista Especializada en la Coordinación General de Pueblos Indígenas Aislados y de Contacto Reciente por la Fundación Nacional del Indígena. Actualmente está cursando un Doctorado en Antropología Social en la Universidad de Brasilia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.202102.016

Keywords:

indigenous politics, indigenous peoples of recent contact, isolated indigenous peoples, Brazil, indigenous rights

Abstract

The policy for indigenous peoples of recent contact (PIRC) in Brazil is under construction. Although the guidelines for post-contact periods were present at other moments in government policy, they did not free indigenous peoples from cruel fates such as massacres, epidemics, and
total extermination. Only after the policy change in 1987 were health measures included in post-contact actions and other actions with an educational bias. In recent years, there have been some advances in internal regulations related to various public policies, highlighting the publication of joint ordinance MS / FUNAI No. 4.094 on health care for indigenous peoples of recent contact. Likewise, the first Territorial and Environmental Management Plans (PGTA) have been formulated by indigenous peoples of recent contact in Brazil. This policy is still «half way» and has some challenges to consolidate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Jabur, C. (2021). A «halfway» policy. Reflections on the policy for Indigenous Peoples of Recent Contact in Brazil. Anthropologica Del Departamento De Ciencias Sociales, 39(47), 413–445. https://doi.org/10.18800/anthropologica.202102.016