Remarks about the accommodation of the ILO 169 Convention criteria about self-identification in the Peruvian legal system

Authors

  • Darwin Duque Morales Universidad de Piura

    Licenciado en derecho por la Universidad de Piura. Abogado de la Coordinación de Hidrocarburos de la Dirección de Supervisión del Organismo de Evaluación y Fiscalización Ambiental (OEFA).

  • Susana Mosquera Monelos Universidad de Piura

    Doctora en derecho con mención europea por la Universidad de A Coruña. Docente de Derecho internacional público de la Universidad de Piura. Investigadora calificada REGINA por el CONCYTEC.

Keywords:

Indigenous identity, Prior consultation, International obligations, Useful effect of treaties, Implementation of treaties, International responsibility of the state

Abstract

Census 2017 had a controversial question regarding indigenous identity. Media tried to explain it, and intended to help citizens to find their answer. But no one lay out the reason for such a question. The reason is related with the indigenous consciousness criteria stablished at the ILO Convention 169, and with the fact that, when the Convention was adapted to Peruvian legal system those criteria were changed. This paper will try to explain that failure implementing the treaty and will suggest a possible solution because the indigenous identity has a major impact on the global indigenous rights, especially regarding their right to prior consultation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-11-07

How to Cite

Duque Morales, D., & Mosquera Monelos, S. (2018). Remarks about the accommodation of the ILO 169 Convention criteria about self-identification in the Peruvian legal system. Derecho & Sociedad, (50), 221–233. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/20389

Issue

Section

Derecho Internacional