ADR a comparative study in common law jurisdiction – How does North America compare with the rest of the world

Authors

  • Richard Bailey Goodman Derrick LLP http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-3177

    MSc in Construction Law and Arbitration at King’s College London. He is a partner at Goodman Derrick LLP and leads the multidisciplinary Construction Team, providing specialist advice to contractors, subcontractors, property owners, developers, consultants, and project stakeholders. Also, he has considerable experience in both domestic and international disputes and specializes in the resolution of construction and engineering disputes through the courts, arbitration, adjudication, and all forms of ADR. Contact: rbailey@gdlaw.co.uk

Keywords:

Alternative dispute resolution (ADR), Mediation, Adjudication, Comparative Analysis, Common Law

Abstract

In this document, the author will provide a general description of ADR in common law jurisdictions, but with a particular emphasis on how ADR is practiced in North America (for this document, it refers to the countries of EE. USA and Canada). Also, will focus on the way ADR is implemented in North America and compare this with the way ADR is implemented in England the largest common law jurisdictions outside of North America. In that sense, as the reader may know, most legal jurisdictions in North America are common law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

Bailey, R. (2020). ADR a comparative study in common law jurisdiction – How does North America compare with the rest of the world. Derecho & Sociedad, (55), 223–232. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/23244

Issue

No. 55 (2020): Derecho de la Construcción

Section

Disputas en construcción

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.