Prior Consultation as a Mandate for the Governance of Aquatic Genetic Resources and their Associated Traditional Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/kawsaypacha.202601.A007Keywords:
Bioprospecting, Biopiracy, Prior Consultation, Aquatic ecosystems, Traditional knowledge, Resource governanceAbstract
Bioprospecting in aquatic ecosystems offers enormous potential for innovation but carries serious risks of biopiracy, which are amplified by the fluid and interconnected nature of these environments. The objective of this reflection paper is to argue that bioprospecting, without effective regulation such as Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC), violates the sovereignty and well-being of local and indigenous communities. Through documentary analysis methodology, academic literature and international legal frameworks, such as ILO Convention 169, it is critically examined to support the thesis. The results reveal that challenges like the «diffuse property» and «interconnected impact» of aquatic resources render traditional consultation models insufficient, facilitating the appropriation of traditional knowledge and threatening food and cultural security. It is concluded that FPIC is not an option but an indispensable legal and ethical imperative. This mechanism, which includes the communities' right to refuse consent, is the tool to rebalance power, ensure fair benefit-sharing, and protect the biocultural heritage of the peoples who steward these vital ecosystems.
Downloads
References
Aguilar, G. (2001). Access to genetic resources and protection of traditional knowledge in the territories of indigenous peoples. Environmental Science & Policy, 4(4-5), 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(01)00028-4
Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1994). Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. En C. Perrings (Ed.), Biodiversity conservation: Problems and policies (pp. 269-287). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1006-8_15
Buck, M., & Hamilton, C. (2011). The Nagoya Protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 20(1), 47-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x
Chiblow S., & McGregor D. (2014). Water is life: Traditional ecological knowledge final report. Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
Corpuz V. (2006). Indigenous peoples and international debates on water: Reflections and challenges. En: Boelens R., Chiba M., & Nakashima D. (Eds.), Water and indigenous peoples, knowledge of nature (pp. 24–35). Paris, France: UNESCO.
Corte Constitucional de Colombia (11 de mayo de 2011). Sentencia C-366. [MP Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva].
Corte Constitucional de Colombia (13 de febrero de 2013). Sentencia C-891. [MP Luis Guillermo Guerrero].
Corte Constitucional de Colombia (22 de mayo de 2006). Sentencia T-382. [MP Clara Vargas].
Corte Constitucional de Colombia (9 de abril de 1996). Sentencia C-139. [MP Carlos Gaviria Díaz].
Corte Constitucional de Ecuador (18 de marzo de 2010). Sentencia No. 001-10-SINCC. [JCP: Patricio Pazmiño Freire].
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2001). Caso de la Comunidad Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni vs. Nicaragua. Serie C, N° 79.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2005a). Caso Comunidad Indígena Yakye Axa Vs. Paraguay. Serie C; N° 125.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2005b). Caso de la Comunidad Moiwana vs. Suriname. Serie C, N° 124.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2012). Caso Pueblo Indígena Kichwa de Sarayaku vs. Ecuador. Serie C, N° 245.
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (2015). Caso de la Comunidad Garífuna de Punta Piedra y Sus Miembros Vs. Honduras. Serie C, N° 304.
Dayuan, X. (2011). The categories and benefit-sharing of traditional knowledge associated with biodiversity. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2(1), 29-33.
De Jonge, B. (2009). Plants, genes and justice: An inquiry into fair and equitable benefit-sharing. Universidad de Wageningen.
Demunshi, Y., & Chugh, A. (2010). Role of traditional knowledge in marine bioprospecting. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 3015-3033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9879-9
Dutfield, G. (2001). TRIPS-related aspects of traditional knowledge. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 33(2), 233-275. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol33/iss2/4
Dutfield, G. (2017). If we have never been modern, they have never been traditional: ‘Traditional knowledge’, biodiversity, and the flawed ABS paradigm. En C. Lawson & B. Rerkasem (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Biodiversity and the Law (pp. 276-290). Routledge.
Estrella, J. (2005). Biodiversidad y recursos genéticos: Una guía para su uso y acceso en el Ecuador. Editorial Abya Yala.
Fraser, D. J., Coon, T., van den Heuvel, M. R., Curry, R. A., & Ruzzante, D. E. (2006). Integrating traditional and evolutionary knowledge in biodiversity conservation: A population level case study. Ecology and Society, 11(2), Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01754-110204
Ghosh, J., & Chakraborty, N. (2024). An approach to the protection of traditional knowledge under the existing IP regime. International Journal of Public Law and Policy, 10(3), 297-317.
Godt, C. (2009). Enforcement of Benefit-Sharing Duties in User Countries. En E. C. Kamau & G. Winter (Eds.), Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and the Law. Solutions for Access & Benefit Sharing (pp. 419-438). Earthscan.
Gómez-Lee, M. I. (2016). Biodiversidad y políticas públicas: Coaliciones de causa en las políticas de acceso a los recursos genéticos en Colombia. Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Hodnett, D. Q. (2021). Legitimising biopiracy? Fairness and efficacy of the Nagoya Protocol. York Law Review, 2, 75. https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/oai/oai:eprints.whiterose.ac.uk:224076
Langton, M., & Rhea, Z. M. (2005). Traditional indigenous biodiversity-related knowledge. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 36(2), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2005.10721248
LaValley G. (2006). Aboriginal traditional knowledge and source water protection: First Nations’ views on taking care of water. Chiefs of Ontario.
Macpherson, E. J. (2019). Indigenous water rights in law and regulation. Cambridge University Press.
Marden, E., Abbott, R. J., Austerlitz, F., Ortiz‐Barrientos, D., Baucom, R. S., Bongaerts, P., ... & Rieseberg, L. H. (2021). Sharing and reporting benefits from biodiversity research. Molecular Ecology, 30(5), 1103-1107. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15702
McGregor, D. (2008). Anishnaabe-kwe, traditional knowledge and water protection. Canadian Woman Studies.
McGregor, D. (2014). Traditional knowledge and water governance: The ethic of responsibility. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 10(5), 493-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/117718011401000505
McManis, C. R. (2012). Biodiversity, biotechnology and traditional knowledge protection: Law, science and practice. En S. Bilderbeek (Ed.), Biodiversity and the Law (pp. 1-23). Routledge.
Nelliyat, P. (2024). Bioprospecting and Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) from Protected Areas (PAs): Scope and Challenges. En Biodiversity and Business (pp. 191-198). Springer, Cham.
O'Bryan, K. (2018). Indigenous rights and water resource management: Not just another stakeholder. Routledge.
Posey, D., & Dutfield, G. (1996). Beyond intellectual property: Toward traditional resource rights for indigenous peoples and local communities. International Development Research Centre.
Prathapan, K. D., & Rajan, P. D. (2011). Biodiversity access and benefit-sharing: weaving a rope of sand. Current Science, 100(3), 290-293.
Ramanjooloo, A., Andersen, R. J., & Bhaw-Luximon, A. (2021). Marine sponge-derived/inspired drugs and their applications in drug delivery systems. Future Medicinal Chemistry, 13(5), 487-504. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2020-0123
Redvers, N., Aubrey, P., Celidwen, Y., & Hill, K. (2023). Indigenous Peoples: Traditional knowledges, climate change, and health. PLOS global public health, 3(10), e0002474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002474
Reihana, T. (2006). The Convention on Biological Diversity’s international regime on access & benefit sharing: Background and considerations for indigenous peoples. Indigenous Peoples Council on Biocolonialism.
Ritchie, M., Dawkins, K., & Valliantos, M. (1995). Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity: The Industrialization of Natural Resources and Traditional Knowledge. St. John's Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development, 11(2), 431-448. https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred/vol11/iss2/6
Robinson, D. F. (2014). Biodiversity, access and benefit-sharing: global case studies. Routledge.
Rodríguez, G. A. (2015). Los derechos de los pueblos indígenas: Luchas, contenido y relaciones. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
Rodríguez, G.A. (2014). De la consulta previa al consentimiento libre, previo e informado a pueblos indígenas en Colombia. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
Ruru J. (2009). Introducing why it matters: Indigenous peoples, the law and water. The Journal of Water Law, 20(5/6), 221–223.
Sunder, M. (2007). The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems, 70(2), 97-124. https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol70/iss2/6
Tamayo-Ortiz, C., & Dilas-Jiménez, J. O. (2021). Conocimientos tradicionales y recursos genéticos: Una revisión conceptual, importancia y marco legal en Ecuador y Perú. Revista de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica Alpha Centauri, 2(3), 2-14. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8092594
Terán, M. Y. (2016). The Nagoya protocol and indigenous peoples. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2016.7.2.6
Torres, R., Rincón, M., & Ceballos, N. (2003). Elementos para la definición de una política de recuperación, protección y fomento del conocimiento tradicional. Instituto Alexander von Humboldt.
Vallejo-Trujillo, F., & Álvarez-Amézquita, D. F. (2023). Distribución justa y equitativa de los beneficios derivados del uso de recursos genéticos y conocimientos tradicionales. Revisión de algunas propuestas normativas y doctrinarias para su implementación. Ius et Praxis, 29(2), 184-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-00122023000200184
Vargas-Chaves, I. (2025). El conocimiento tradicional de las comunidades negras en el discurso global sobre la conservación de la biodiversidad. Revista de Direito Econômico e Socioambiental, 16(1), e296. https://doi.org/10.7213/rev.dir.econ.soc.v16i1.32229
Vargas-Chaves, I., Rodríguez, G. A. & Blumenkranc, H. (2020). Propiedad intelectual sobre los conocimientos tradicionales agrícolas. Editorial Universidad del Rosario.
