The Law as an Instrument of Incremental Social Change

Authors

  • Lawrence Friedman Stanford University
  • Jack Landinski University of Wisconsin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.196901.003

Keywords:

Law, society, social change, legal change, public instrument, social relations, formal changes

Abstract

Historically, social science has relegated the function of law to one of social control. As a result, this article seeks to highlight the importance of law as an instrument of social change. In this context, the authors address the relationship between law, legal change and social change through various examples that reflect the extent to which law affects social demands. Thus, the article establishes that law is a mechanism that regulates human relations in order to achieve social goals. For its part, social change can be understood as an evident modification in the patterns of behavior and relationships between people, emanating from the conscious and rational decision of individuals to solve their problems. Now, legal change is that change that takes place in the legal world; however, in order to better understand this change, the types of relationships between law and social change must be evaluated. The paper concludes by pointing out that law acts as an instrument of social change by being able to influence people's behavior, either through the imposition of sanctions or persuasion; and such a change in behavior can only be achieved if the rule is communicated and accepted by the society it is intended to affect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Rose, A. M. (1965). Sociology: The Study of Human Relations. (2da. Ed).

Deesing, P. (1962). Reason in Society.

Miller, A. S. (1963). Notes on the concept of the living constitution. The George Washington Law Review, 31(5), 881-918.

Friedman, L. (1966). “On Legalistic Reasining: A Footnote to Weber” Wisconsin Law Review. 148.

Wechsler, H. (1961). “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law”. Principles, Politics and Fundamental Law.

Bickel, A. M. (1962). The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court al the Bar of Politics.

Friedman, L. M. & Landinsky, J. (1967). Social Change and the Law of Industrial Accidents”, 67 Columbia Law Review 50, 72-77.

Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making of the English Working Class.

David, S. (1966). Living Through the Industrial Revolution.

Laslett, P. (1965). The World We Have Lost: English Society Before and After the Coming of Industry.

Dahl, R. A., & Lindblom, C. E. (1953). Politics, Economics, and Welfare.

Braybrooke, D., & Lindblom, C. E. (1963). A strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process.

Cyret, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm.

Popper, K. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies.

Etzioni, A. (1963). The Epigenesis of Political Communities as the International Level. American Journal of Sociology, 68, 407-421.

Etzioni, A. (1963). European Unification: A Strategy of Change, World Politics, 16.

Hurst, W. (1960). The law in United States history.

Shapiro, M. (1965). Stability and Change in Judicial Decision-Making: Incrementalism or State Decisis? Law in Transition Quarterly, 2, 134-157.

Wells, R. S. & Grossman, J. B. (1967). The Concept of Judicial Policy-Macking: A critique. Journal of Public Law, 15, 308-309.

Honnold, J. (Ed). (1964). The Life of the Law, 100-143.

Holdsworth, W. S. (1922). History of English Law.

Thurman, K. E. (1966). The Married Women’s Property Acts. University of Winconsin Law School.

Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).

Ann. Rpt. I.N.S., año terminado Junio 30, 1962, Tabla 6, p. 23

Ann. Rpt. Ins, año terminado Junio 30, 1957, p. 20.

Audiencias ante Subcomm. of Comm. on Judiciary, H. R., 89th Cong. 1st. Sess., on H.R. 2580, para enmendar la "Inmigration Nationality Act", p. 89. 20a 163 U.S. 537 (1896).

Sweatt vs. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950).

Levi, E. H. (1962). An Introduction to Legal Reasoning.

Friedman, L. (1967). Legal Rules and the Process of Social Change,

Friedman, L. M. (1967). Legal Rules and the Process of Social Change. Stanford Law Review, 19(4), 786–840.

Priestley v Fowler. 3 Mees & Wels 1. (1837).

Murray vs. South Carolina Railroad. Co., 1 McM 385 (S. C., 1841).

Farwell vs. Bastan and Worcester Railroad Corp., 4 Mete. 49 (Mass., 1842)

Dror, Y. (1959) Law and Social Change, 33 Tulane Law Review 787.

Rose, A. (1956). The Use of Law and Social Change, 6, Transactions of the third World Congress of Sociology.

Tumin, M. (1958). Desegregations Resistence and Readiness. Princeton University.

Roche, J. & Gordon, M. (May 22, 1955). Can Morality be Legislated? New York Times Magazine, p. 10, 42, 44, 49.

Miller, A. (1963). Notes on the Concept of the ‘Living Constitution’, 31 Geo. Wash L. Rev. 890

Miller, A. (1964). Technology, Social Change, and the Constitution, 33 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 23.

MacAulay, S. (1967). Law and the Balance of Power.

Bohannan, P. (1967). The Differing Realms of the Law. En P. Bohannan (Ed.), Law and Warfare.

Published

1969-12-01

How to Cite

Friedman, L., & Landinski, J. (1969). The Law as an Instrument of Incremental Social Change. Derecho PUCP, (27), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.196901.003

Issue

Section

Estudios