El modelo de relaciones colectivas peruano: del intervencionista y restrictivo al promocional
Abstract
The model of peruvian collective relations: from interventionist and restrictive to promotional
The article begins by considering a system or democratic model of labor relations implies a significant degree of self-gravitating through the presence of collective autonomy as self-regulation agreed in relations between the representatives of workers and employers. That collides with the fact that
in Latin America, with the exception of Uruguay, the model is remarkably restrictive. Although our country since the Constitutionof 1979 explicitly ascribes to the model of Social State of Law – which in the labor field was expressed in the consecration of a democratic model of labor relations, this has not had correlation with the infra-constitutional regulation.
Then, the article presents the main characteristics of a democratic model of labor relations which has as main features: i.–The dialectical conception of labor relations and assignment to the conflict of a functional role within the constitutional scheme, ii.– The consecration of collective autonomy as an essential piece of the regulatory system, iii.– The promotional intervention and feeder system from the state as a notion of closure of exceptional transcendence. Finally, the article points out the principalnovelties on the subject contained in the Project of General Labor Law, the same that is in line within the new Latin American context of impulse of the collective autonomy that exists in countries like Brazil, Paraguay, Dominican Republic, Uruguay and also seeks to promote the gradual substitution of decentralized and dysfunctional model for the functioning of the country, establishing a certain preference for the sectorial bargaining.
References
Cedrola Spremolla, Gerardo (1994) . «Los enfoques teóricos en relaciones laborales». Relasur, 2 , pp. 49-74.
Dunlop, John Thomas (1958). Industrial Relations System. Nueva York: H. Holt and Company.
Ermida Uriarte, Óscar (1993). «La intervención estatal en las relaciones colectivas de trabajo latinoamericanas». Revista Nueva Sociedad, 128 , pp. 29-34.
Ermida Uriarte, Oscar y Alfredo Villavicencio Ríos (1991). Sindicatos en libertad sindical. Lima: ADEC-ATC, p. 28.
Kahn-Freund, Otto (1987). Trabajo y Derecho. Traducción de Jesús Galiana. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social, p. 55.
Neves Mujica, Javier (2000). «Balance de la Reforma Laboral ». Revista Asesoría Laboral. Lima, diciembre 2000, p. 8.
Ojeda Avilés, Antonio (2003). Derecho sindical. Octava edición. Madrid: Tecnos, pp. 88 y ss.
Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT) (1999). Informe de la Comisión de Expertos en la Aplicación de Convenios y Recomendaciones, Informe III (Parte 1.A). Ginebra, p. 5.
Palomeque Lopez, Manuel Carlos (1993). «El sistema constitucional de relaciones sindicales en España». En Ermida Uriarte, Óscar (coord.). Intervención y autonomía en las relaciones colectivas de trabajo. Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, pp. 141-143.
Sanguineti Raymond, Wilfredo, «Los sindicatos y la libertad sindical en la nueva Ley de Relaciones Colectivas de Trabajo (Decreto Ley 25593)». En autores varios. Quo vadis jus? Estudios jurídicos en homenaje al Profesor Ricardo La Hoz Tirado. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos/Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas, 1994, pp. 258-295.
Windmuller, John Philip (1987). «Nueva consideración de la negociación colectiva en los países industrializados». Informe para la Organización Internacional del Trabajo, Ministerio de Trabajo y Seguridad Social. Madrid, p. 20.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.