Innovating evidence procedure in international construction arbitration

Authors

  • Doug Jones Independent International Arbitrator http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5266-2709

    Master of Laws (1977), Bachelor of Arts (1974) and Bachelor of Laws (1972) from the University of Queensland. Professor Jones also holds professorial appointments at Queen Mary College, University of London and Melbourne University Law School. Professor Jones is a leading independent international commercial and investor-state arbitrator with over 40 years’ prior experience as an international transactional and disputes projects lawyer. Contacto: dougjones@dougjones.info. 

Keywords:

Evidence procedure, Construction, Arbitration, Innovation, Evidence, Virtual hearings, Case management, Technology

Abstract

The complexity of construction disputes commands special attention and constant innovation. Fortunately, arbitration is well-equipped to meet the challenges of such disputes, due to its flexibility and adaptability. This paper discusses three areas of innovation in evidence procedure unique to construction disputes: institutional, technological and procedural. Due consideration is also given to the virtual hearing, an innovation which has proven critical to the survival of arbitration amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology, while valuable, will not improve the efficiency of arbitration alone: it must be used in conjunction with procedural innovations. The implementation of procedural, technological and institutional advancements by a proactive tribunal and open-minded parties can create boundless innovation and provide maximum value for all involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

How to Cite

Jones, D. (2020). Innovating evidence procedure in international construction arbitration. Derecho & Sociedad, (55), 233–253. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/derechoysociedad/article/view/23245

Issue

Section

Disputas en construcción