Jurisprudential criteria of the Supreme Court about the dismissal null

Authors

  • Jorge Toyama Miyagusuku Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Profesor principal de la Pontificia Universidad la Católica del Perú. Profesor en la Universidad del Pacífico y en la Universidad de Piura. Miembro extraordinario de la Asociación IUS ET VERITAS. Especialista en Derecho Laboral. Socio de Miranda & Amado Abogados
  • Carole Ivonne Neyra Salazar Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Magíster en Derecho de la Empresa por la PUCP. Profesora de Derecho Laboral en la Universidad de San Martín de Porres.
    Especialista en Derecho Laboral.

Keywords:

Dismissal Null, Job Security, Supreme Court, Union Membership, Process against the Employer, Discrimination, Pregnancy

Abstract

In this article, the authors explain some notions about job security and some general aspects of the nullity of the dismissal (proof of the dismissal null and its causes). Also, they explain the judicial criteria on the nullity of dismissal that have been issued through cassation rulings by the Supreme Court. Among these criteria are union membership or participation in union activities, filing a complaint or participation in processes against the employer, discrimination, and pregnancy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-07

How to Cite

Toyama Miyagusuku, J., & Neyra Salazar, C. I. (2016). Jurisprudential criteria of the Supreme Court about the dismissal null. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(52), 232–257. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/16383

Issue

No. 52 (2016)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2017 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.